Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-H10
69 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-H10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1008mm (F3.4-6.0) lens
- 441g - 120 x 82 x 92mm
- Launched July 2014
- Succeeded the Canon SX510 HS
- Updated by Canon SX530 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-H10 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Canon SX520 HS and Casio EX-H10, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Casio. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the SX520 HS (16MP) and EX-H10 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX520 HS was announced 5 years later than the EX-H10 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the SX520 HS scores vs the EX-H10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-H10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX520 HS & Casio Exilim EX-H10. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX520 HS Gallery & Casio EX-H10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX520 HS over the Casio EX-H10
| SX520 HS | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2014 |  | June 2009 | More recent by 63 months |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Canon SX520 HS
| EX-H10 | SX520 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX520 HS and Casio EX-H10
| SX520 HS | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-H10 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX520 HS enjoys outer dimensions of 120mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") along with a weight of 441 grams (0.97 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-H10 has dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Canon SX520 HS and Casio EX-H10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the SX520 HS versus the EX-H10.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX520 HS and EX-H10 is 69 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-H10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX520 HS and EX-H10.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Canon SX520 HS to show extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The newer SX520 HS is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-H10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-H10 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Casio Exilim EX-H10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-07-29 | 2009-06-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1008mm (42.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.0 | f/3.2-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m | 3.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 441g (0.97 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 82 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | NP-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $219 | $300 |