Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-Z400
69 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1008mm (F3.4-6.0) lens
- 441g - 120 x 82 x 92mm
- Introduced July 2014
- Older Model is Canon SX510 HS
- Updated by Canon SX530 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Canon SX520 HS versus Casio EX-Z400, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Casio. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the SX520 HS (16MP) and EX-Z400 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SX520 HS was brought out 5 years later than the EX-Z400 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX520 HS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summary of how the SX520 HS scores against the EX-Z400 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX520 HS and Casio Exilim EX-Z400. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX520 HS Gallery and Casio EX-Z400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX520 HS over the Casio EX-Z400
| SX520 HS | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2014 | January 2009 | Fresher by 68 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Canon SX520 HS
| EX-Z400 | SX520 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX520 HS and Casio EX-Z400
| SX520 HS | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon SX520 HS enjoys outer dimensions of 120mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") having a weight of 441 grams (0.97 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z400 has measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
See the Canon SX520 HS versus Casio EX-Z400 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the SX520 HS and the EX-Z400.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX520 HS and EX-Z400 is 69 and 95 respectively.
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX520 HS and EX-Z400.
Clearly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Canon SX520 HS to give greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The newer SX520 HS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2014-07-29 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1008mm (42.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.0 | f/2.6-7.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1/2 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 441 grams (0.97 lbs) | 130 grams (0.29 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 82 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | NP-40 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $219 | $0 |