Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR15
69 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eea4d/eea4d584cf9b97501d69267de6ce67c4e6de70ec" alt="Canon PowerShot SX520 HS front Canon PowerShot SX520 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45935/45935cd57d74e35c1f19875df2e85c33ee5d58cd" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front"
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1008mm (F3.4-6.0) lens
- 441g - 120 x 82 x 92mm
- Introduced July 2014
- Superseded the Canon SX510 HS
- Successor is Canon SX530 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR15 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Canon SX520 HS and Casio EX-ZR15, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Casio. The resolution of the SX520 HS (16MP) and the EX-ZR15 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SX520 HS was launched 2 years later than the EX-ZR15 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SX520 HS matches up versus the EX-ZR15 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX520 HS and Casio Exilim EX-ZR15. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX520 HS Gallery and Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX520 HS over the Casio EX-ZR15
SX520 HS | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Canon SX520 HS
EX-ZR15 | SX520 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX520 HS and Casio EX-ZR15
SX520 HS | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 461k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR15 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX520 HS comes with physical dimensions of 120mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") along with a weight of 441 grams (0.97 lbs) and the Casio EX-ZR15 has measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX520 HS and Casio EX-ZR15 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the SX520 HS versus the EX-ZR15.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b7e6/2b7e64a85f1226db0c84965470fba8afbe95a4e2" alt="Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR15 size comparison Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR15 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SX520 HS and EX-ZR15 is 69 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e0e1/7e0e112d4433c5b2cae07f89c0f4ba4176ab8e0a" alt="Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR15 top view buttons comparison Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR15 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR15 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking technical specs. The visual here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX520 HS and EX-ZR15.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of photos though you would want to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The younger SX520 HS is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fb28/7fb2833631bf9c79c634fe2a64417565753e9824" alt="Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR15 sensor size comparison Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR15 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR15 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/deb98/deb985457934d2b8c1bf38e0e3d3abcb506ebbb8" alt="Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR15 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Casio |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2014-07-29 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 4+ | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1008mm (42.0x) | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.0 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 0cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m | 5.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 441 grams (0.97 lbs) | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 82 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 images | 325 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-6LH | NP-110 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $219 | $249 |