Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300
Portability
69 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
69 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Key Specs
Canon SX520 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1008mm (F3.4-6.0) lens
- 441g - 120 x 82 x 92mm
- Introduced July 2014
- Older Model is Canon SX510 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX530 HS
Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Canon SX520 HS versus Casio EX-ZR300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Canon and Casio. The image resolution of the SX520 HS (16MP) and the EX-ZR300 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX520 HS was released 2 years later than the EX-ZR300 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the SX520 HS scores versus the EX-ZR300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX520 HS and Casio Exilim EX-ZR300. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX520 HS Gallery and Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX520 HS over the Casio EX-ZR300
| SX520 HS | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2014 |  | May 2012 | Fresher by 27 months |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Canon SX520 HS
| EX-ZR300 | SX520 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX520 HS and Casio EX-ZR300
| SX520 HS | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 461k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX520 HS provides exterior measurements of 120mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") and a weight of 441 grams (0.97 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-ZR300 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX520 HS versus Casio EX-ZR300 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the SX520 HS against the EX-ZR300.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX520 HS and EX-ZR300 is 69 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through specs. The visual here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SX520 HS and EX-ZR300.
All in all, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same MP and you should expect comparable quality of photographs though you should always factor the release date of the cameras into account. The fresher SX520 HS provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX520 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Portrait photography camera
you can focus manually
good resolution (16MP)
comes with face detect focusing
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Canon SX520 HS Street photography factors
Casio EX-ZR300 Street photography factors
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205g)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon SX520 HS
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR300
excellent zoom range (24-1008mm 42.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (210 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect AF
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
great battery life (500 shots)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Canon SX520 HS Travel photography highlights
Casio EX-ZR300 Travel photography highlights
good resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (1008mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
not so great battery power (210 shots)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
great battery life (500 CIPA)
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
does not offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Canon SX520 HS Landscape photography factors
Casio EX-ZR300 Landscape photography factors
you can focus manually
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
not so great battery power (210 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse function
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
great battery life (500 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Canon SX520 HS Vlogging advice
Casio EX-ZR300 Vlogging advice
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone support
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (205g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
lack of external mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX520 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-07-29 | 2012-05-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4+ | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1008mm (42.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.0 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 441 gr (0.97 pounds) | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 82 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 shots | 500 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $219 | $329 |