Canon SX520 HS vs Fujifilm F800EXR
Portability
69 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
69 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
90 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Canon SX520 HS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Key Specs
Canon SX520 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1008mm (F3.4-6.0) lens
- 441g - 120 x 82 x 92mm
- Introduced July 2014
- Earlier Model is Canon SX510 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX530 HS
Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched July 2012
- Older Model is Fujifilm F770EXR
- Replacement is Fujifilm F900EXR
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX520 HS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Overview
Lets look much closer at the Canon SX520 HS versus Fujifilm F800EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the SX520 HS (16MP) and the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) is fairly similar but the SX520 HS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX520 HS was unveiled 2 years later than the Fujifilm F800EXR and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SX520 HS grades versus the Fujifilm F800EXR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX520 HS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX520 HS and Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR. The full galleries are available at Canon SX520 HS Gallery and Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX520 HS over the Fujifilm F800EXR
| SX520 HS | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2014 |  | July 2012 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Canon SX520 HS
| Fujifilm F800EXR | SX520 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX520 HS and Fujifilm F800EXR
| SX520 HS | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Canon SX520 HS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Canon SX520 HS has got outer measurements of 120mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") having a weight of 441 grams (0.97 lbs) while the Fujifilm F800EXR has sizing of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Canon SX520 HS versus Fujifilm F800EXR in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the SX520 HS compared to the Fujifilm F800EXR.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SX520 HS and Fujifilm F800EXR is 69 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX520 HS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing only by going over a spec sheet. The visual here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX520 HS and Fujifilm F800EXR.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical MP but not the same sensor sizing. The SX520 HS has got the tinier sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier. The more modern SX520 HS is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX520 HS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX520 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Fujifilm F800EXR as a Portrait photography camera
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
good megapixels (16MP)
features face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
manual focus not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Canon SX520 HS as a Street photography camera
Fujifilm F800EXR as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competition (232 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2")
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon SX520 HS
Sports photography with Fujifilm F800EXR
great zoom range (24-1008mm 42.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
supports tracking focus
slow frames per second (2.0 frames/s)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (210 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
long zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
sensor is very small (1/2")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon SX520 HS
Travel photography with Fujifilm F800EXR
good resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1008mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
terrible battery life (210 shots)
does not feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
lighter than competition (232 grams)
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
no Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Canon SX520 HS Landscape photography factors
Fujifilm F800EXR Landscape photography factors
you can focus manually
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
terrible battery life (210 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse recording
fairly wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports RAW formats
manual focus not available
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor is very small (1/2")
no Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Canon SX520 HS Vlogging details
Fujifilm F800EXR Vlogging details
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
does not feature selfie friendly display
lack of mic port
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (232g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
no external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX520 HS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-07-29 | 2012-07-25 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4+ | EXR |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | EXRCMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1008mm (42.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.0 | f/3.5-5.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 11.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 441 gr (0.97 lb) | 232 gr (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 82 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 41 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.9 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 143 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | 300 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | NP-50A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $219 | $330 |