Canon SX520 HS vs Kodak Z980
69 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Canon SX520 HS vs Kodak Z980 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1008mm (F3.4-6.0) lens
- 441g - 120 x 82 x 92mm
- Revealed July 2014
- Older Model is Canon SX510 HS
- Refreshed by Canon SX530 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Announced January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX520 HS vs Kodak Z980 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Canon SX520 HS vs Kodak Z980, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Canon and Kodak. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX520 HS (16MP) and Z980 (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX520 HS was launched 5 years after the Z980 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the SX520 HS matches up vs the Z980 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX520 HS vs Kodak Z980 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX520 HS & Kodak EasyShare Z980. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX520 HS Gallery & Kodak Z980 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX520 HS over the Kodak Z980
| SX520 HS | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2014 | January 2009 | More modern by 68 months | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 201k | Sharper screen (+260k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Canon SX520 HS
| Z980 | SX520 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX520 HS and Kodak Z980
| SX520 HS | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Canon SX520 HS vs Kodak Z980 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon SX520 HS offers outer dimensions of 120mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") and a weight of 441 grams (0.97 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z980 has measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") along with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX520 HS vs Kodak Z980 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the SX520 HS compared to the Z980.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SX520 HS and Z980 is 69 and 68 respectively.
Canon SX520 HS vs Kodak Z980 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing technical specs. The pic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SX520 HS and Z980.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Canon SX520 HS to produce more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher SX520 HS is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX520 HS vs Kodak Z980 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX520 HS vs Kodak Z980 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Kodak |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z980 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-07-29 | 2009-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1008mm (42.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.0 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 201 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m | 6.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 441 grams (0.97 lbs) | 445 grams (0.98 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 82 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $219 | $249 |