Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
69 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eea4d/eea4d584cf9b97501d69267de6ce67c4e6de70ec" alt="Canon PowerShot SX520 HS front Canon PowerShot SX520 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c7c/41c7c096f5b120d51cec7dfdff2b001e8780d88f" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS front Olympus TG-630 iHS front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1008mm (F3.4-6.0) lens
- 441g - 120 x 82 x 92mm
- Announced July 2014
- Replaced the Canon SX510 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX530 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Canon SX520 HS and Olympus TG-630 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX520 HS (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The SX520 HS was manufactured 19 months after the TG-630 iHS which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the SX520 HS matches up versus the TG-630 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX520 HS and Olympus TG-630 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX520 HS Gallery and Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX520 HS over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
SX520 HS | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 19 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Canon SX520 HS
TG-630 iHS | SX520 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX520 HS and Olympus TG-630 iHS
SX520 HS | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX520 HS has external dimensions of 120mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") along with a weight of 441 grams (0.97 lbs) while the Olympus TG-630 iHS has proportions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX520 HS and Olympus TG-630 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the SX520 HS versus the TG-630 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a043a/a043a175c7f389d1e11135f82d8bd2e954b9d94c" alt="Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SX520 HS and TG-630 iHS is 69 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb4e7/eb4e797ea7c58535b2d362daf0440e226cc6c694" alt="Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing technical specs. The image underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX520 HS and TG-630 iHS.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Canon SX520 HS to provide you with more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger SX520 HS is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/febd3/febd30b7219f21a0d0e4d40e80cf3ddecc9c29a8" alt="Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison"
Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/907bf/907bf838cc0f85a895a266260a9a4b296a0ac06a" alt="Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2014-07-29 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 4+ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1008mm (42.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.0 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 441g (0.97 lb) | 167g (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 82 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 photographs | 220 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-6LH | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $219 | $200 |