Canon SX520 HS vs Ricoh WG-30W

Following is a complete review of the Canon SX520 HS and Ricoh WG-30W, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SX520 HS (16MP) and the WG-30W (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The SX520 HS was brought out 2 months before the WG-30W which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the SX520 HS scores vs the WG-30W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX520 HS and Ricoh WG-30W. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX520 HS Gallery and Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.

In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and size. The Canon SX520 HS provides exterior measurements of 120mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") with a weight of 441 grams (0.97 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30W has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Examine the Canon SX520 HS and Ricoh WG-30W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the SX520 HS and the WG-30W.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX520 HS and WG-30W is 69 and 91 respectively.

Quite often, it's tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing specs. The pic underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SX520 HS and WG-30W.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of files however you need to factor the production date of the cameras into account.