Canon SX520 HS vs Samsung HZ30W
69 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
91 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Canon SX520 HS vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1008mm (F3.4-6.0) lens
- 441g - 120 x 82 x 92mm
- Launched July 2014
- Previous Model is Canon SX510 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX530 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is WB600
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX520 HS vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Canon SX520 HS and Samsung HZ30W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Canon and Samsung. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the SX520 HS (16MP) and HZ30W (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX520 HS was released 4 years later than the HZ30W and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the SX520 HS matches up vs the HZ30W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX520 HS vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX520 HS and Samsung HZ30W. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX520 HS Gallery and Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX520 HS over the Samsung HZ30W
| SX520 HS | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2014 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 56 months |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Canon SX520 HS
| HZ30W | SX520 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX520 HS and Samsung HZ30W
| SX520 HS | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Canon SX520 HS vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon SX520 HS comes with external measurements of 120mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") with a weight of 441 grams (0.97 lbs) while the Samsung HZ30W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX520 HS and Samsung HZ30W in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the SX520 HS compared to the HZ30W.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SX520 HS and HZ30W is 69 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX520 HS vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by reading a spec sheet. The visual below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX520 HS and HZ30W.
As you can see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Canon SX520 HS to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics more aggressively. The younger SX520 HS provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Canon SX520 HS vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX520 HS vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Samsung HZ30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Samsung HZ30W |
| Also called as | - | WB600 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-07-29 | 2010-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1008mm (42.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-6.0 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 441 grams (0.97 lbs) | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 82 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $219 | $280 |