Canon SX520 HS vs Sony HX300
69 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Canon SX520 HS vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1008mm (F3.4-6.0) lens
- 441g - 120 x 82 x 92mm
- Revealed July 2014
- Superseded the Canon SX510 HS
- New Model is Canon SX530 HS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Succeeded the Sony HX200V
- Successor is Sony HX400V
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX520 HS vs Sony HX300 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Canon SX520 HS versus Sony HX300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Sony. The resolution of the SX520 HS (16MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX520 HS was brought out 18 months after the HX300 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX520 HS being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SX520 HS scores versus the HX300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX520 HS vs Sony HX300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX520 HS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX520 HS Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX520 HS over the Sony HX300
| SX520 HS | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2014 |  | February 2013 | More modern by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Canon SX520 HS
| HX300 | SX520 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX520 HS and Sony HX300
| SX520 HS | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Canon SX520 HS vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Canon SX520 HS enjoys outer dimensions of 120mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") having a weight of 441 grams (0.97 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has specifications of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX520 HS versus Sony HX300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the SX520 HS and the HX300.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX520 HS and HX300 is 69 and 63 respectively.
Canon SX520 HS vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes simply by looking at specifications. The pic below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX520 HS and HX300.
Plainly, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Sony HX300 to give you extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher SX520 HS provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX520 HS vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SX520 HS vs Sony HX300 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-07-29 | 2013-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1008mm (42.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.0 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 441 gr (0.97 lb) | 623 gr (1.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 82 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $219 | $339 |