Canon SX530 HS vs Kodak Z990
69 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Canon SX530 HS vs Kodak Z990 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 442g - 120 x 82 x 92mm
- Launched January 2015
- Previous Model is Canon SX520 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Other Name is EasyShare Max
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX530 HS vs Kodak Z990 Overview
Below is a in-depth review of the Canon SX530 HS vs Kodak Z990, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Canon and Kodak. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the SX530 HS (16MP) and Z990 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX530 HS was introduced 4 years later than the Z990 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SX530 HS matches up against the Z990 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Canon SX530 HS vs Kodak Z990 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX530 HS and Kodak EasyShare Z990. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX530 HS Gallery and Kodak Z990 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX530 HS over the Kodak Z990
| SX530 HS | Z990 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2015 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 49 months |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Canon SX530 HS
| Z990 | SX530 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX530 HS and Kodak Z990
| SX530 HS | Z990 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Canon SX530 HS vs Kodak Z990 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and volume. The Canon SX530 HS enjoys outer measurements of 120mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") with a weight of 442 grams (0.97 lbs) and the Kodak Z990 has sizing of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
See the Canon SX530 HS vs Kodak Z990 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the SX530 HS versus the Z990.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX530 HS and Z990 is 69 and 68 respectively.
Canon SX530 HS vs Kodak Z990 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX530 HS and Z990.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Canon SX530 HS to render greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger SX530 HS is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX530 HS vs Kodak Z990 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX530 HS vs Kodak Z990 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX530 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Kodak |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX530 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z990 |
| Also called | - | EasyShare Max |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2015-01-06 | 2011-01-04 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.6 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m | 8.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 442 gr (0.97 lbs) | 445 gr (0.98 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 82 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $379 | $299 |
