Canon SX540 HS vs Casio EX-Z35
69 Imaging
46 Features
44 Overall
45
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Canon SX540 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 442g - 120 x 82 x 92mm
- Introduced January 2016
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX540 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Canon SX540 HS versus Casio EX-Z35, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Canon and Casio. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the SX540 HS (20MP) and EX-Z35 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX540 HS was launched 5 years after the EX-Z35 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX540 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the SX540 HS matches up vs the EX-Z35 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX540 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX540 HS & Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX540 HS Gallery & Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX540 HS over the Casio EX-Z35
| SX540 HS | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2016 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 72 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Canon SX540 HS
| EX-Z35 | SX540 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX540 HS and Casio EX-Z35
| SX540 HS | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX540 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX540 HS has got outside measurements of 120mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") and a weight of 442 grams (0.97 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z35 has proportions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX540 HS versus Casio EX-Z35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the SX540 HS compared to the EX-Z35.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX540 HS and EX-Z35 is 69 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX540 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX540 HS and EX-Z35.
Clearly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Canon SX540 HS to provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent SX540 HS will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Canon SX540 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX540 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX540 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX540 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2016-01-05 | 2010-02-21 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 6 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.9 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 442 gr (0.97 pounds) | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 82 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 205 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | NP-82 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $99 |