Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z35
61 Imaging
40 Features
67 Overall
50
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-1365mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 650g - 128 x 93 x 114mm
- Announced September 2014
- Older Model is Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Canon SX60 HS versus Casio EX-Z35, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Canon and Casio. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the SX60 HS (16MP) and EX-Z35 (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX60 HS was manufactured 4 years after the EX-Z35 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX60 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the SX60 HS matches up vs the EX-Z35 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX60 HS and Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX60 HS Gallery and Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX60 HS over the Casio EX-Z35
SX60 HS | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | February 2010 | Newer by 56 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Canon SX60 HS
EX-Z35 | SX60 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX60 HS and Casio EX-Z35
SX60 HS | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX60 HS features physical measurements of 128mm x 93mm x 114mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 4.5") and a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z35 has dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX60 HS versus Casio EX-Z35 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the SX60 HS compared to the EX-Z35.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SX60 HS and EX-Z35 is 61 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specs. The picture below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SX60 HS and EX-Z35.
All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Canon SX60 HS to give extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The newer SX60 HS will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Casio |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX60 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2014-09-16 | 2010-02-21 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 6 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-1365mm (65.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 0cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 922k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.4 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m | 3.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 650g (1.43 pounds) | 124g (0.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 128 x 93 x 114mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 4.5") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 39 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 19.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 127 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-10L | NP-82 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $549 | $99 |