Canon PowerShot SX60 HS vs Nikon Coolpix S9100: A Deep Dive Into Two Small Sensor Superzooms

In the landscape of digital compact superzoom cameras, two models that often attract attention from enthusiasts seeking vast focal ranges and versatility are Canon’s PowerShot SX60 HS and Nikon’s Coolpix S9100. Though both fall under the “Small Sensor Superzoom” category featuring 1/2.3” sensors, their design philosophies, feature sets, and real-world performance characteristics differ markedly. Drawing on extensive hands-on testing, thousands of shots, and detailed technical evaluation, this comparison explores how these two cameras stack up across major photography disciplines and user needs, from portraiture to wildlife, landscapes to video, and beyond.

This analysis is targeted at serious hobbyists and professionals who require an informed, nuanced comparison that balances technical rigor with real-world usability. We look beyond spec sheets to evaluate handling, image quality, autofocus prowess, connectivity, and overall value - helping you determine which might be your next trusted photographic tool.

First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics

Before delving into pixels and processing, the physical feel and operational logic of a camera significantly impact your creative workflow and endurance during shoots - particularly for genres demanding extended use, like wildlife or travel photography.

Canon SX60 HS:

Canon’s SX60 HS is a robust bridge-style camera embodying an SLR-like grip and control layout, designed to balance superzoom capability with comfortable handling. Its substantial 650g body affords heft without being cumbersome, and the deep grip combined with an articulating 3-inch screen (922k dots) facilitates versatile shooting angles, including low or overhead shots essential in street and macro photography. The electronic viewfinder (EVF) with the same 922k resolution delivers a clear, responsive framing experience, crucial under bright outdoor conditions.

Nikon S9100:

Conversely, Nikon’s S9100 opts for a compact, pocketable design weighing just 214g, with physical dimensions around one-third the Canon’s in volume. Its slim 3-inch fixed TFT LCD offers similar resolution (~921k dots) but lacks articulation - limiting compositional flexibility, especially for unconventional angles. The absence of an EVF means photographing in bright conditions requires relying solely on the rear screen, which may hinder usability in direct sunlight.

Canon’s layout provides dedicated dials and buttons facilitating manual exposure modes (shutter, aperture priority), while Nikon adopts a simplified interface with fewer manual controls, reflecting its more automatics-oriented design philosophy.

Summary: The SX60 HS is ergonomically superior for photographers who prioritize manual operation, while the S9100 favors portability and casual shooting.

Sensor and Image Quality: Technical Foundations

Both cameras utilize 1/2.3" type BSI-CMOS sensors, a common choice in superzoom compacts for maximizing zoom reach while retaining modest sensor area. Despite identical sensor sizes (6.17x4.55mm, 28.07mm²), they differ in resolution and processing technology.

• Canon SX60 HS: 16MP resolution, paired with Canon’s DIGIC 6 processor, supports RAW capture - an important advantage for professionals and enthusiasts demanding post-processing flexibility. The DIGIC 6’s improved noise reduction and detail rendering yield an elevated dynamic range (~10.1 EV) and color depth (19.2 bits) compared to predecessors and peers.

• Nikon S9100: 12MP resolution, processed by the Expeed C2 engine, produces respectable JPEG images but lacks RAW support, limiting creative control. The lower effective pixel count may enhance per-pixel sensitivity but constrains cropping or large prints.

Image Quality in Practice

Canon’s higher resolution and RAW capability allow finer detail and corrective latitude, beneficial for landscape or macro photography where post-processing reveals texture and nuance. Nikon’s images exhibit slightly softer details and more aggressive noise reduction at higher ISOs, which may appeal to casual shooters favoring ready-made JPEGs without fuss.

Autofocus Systems and Performance

Autofocus (AF) speed, accuracy, and modes frequently dictate success in fast-paced shooting such as sports, wildlife, and street photography.

Canon’s SX60 HS employs enhanced contrast detection with continuous autofocus and tracking that proved more responsive in hands-on testing, particularly for moving subjects in challenging lighting. Nikon’s S9100 provides single autofocus without continuous capabilities - a critical shortcoming for sports or wildlife shooters relying on focus retention as subjects move unpredictably.

In real-world use, Canon’s autofocus maintained lock more consistently on human faces and was less prone to “hunting” than Nikon’s system. The lack of phase detection AF and fewer focus points in both cameras limit pinpoint accuracy compared to advanced mirrorless or DSLR systems but is still commendable for their class.

Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Reliability

Both models lack advanced weather sealing, restricting outdoor use in adverse conditions.

• Canon SX60 HS: Constructed from robust plastics and metal components, it feels solid but lacks dust and moisture protection.

• Nikon S9100: More lightweight and compact, with a plastic-heavy build that’s less reassuring for extreme environments.

Neither camera offers freezeproof, shockproof, or crushproof ratings, reinforcing their focus as consumer-level superzooms rather than rugged field tools.

Screen and Viewfinder Usability

The articulating screen on Canon provides unmatched compositional flexibility not offered by Nikon's fixed display. Canon’s EVF replicates framing in bright conditions where LCD visibility falters.

Nikon's S9100 requires reliance on the rear TFT alone, making bright outdoor shooting more challenging. Both displays have crisp resolution suitable for detail checking, but Canon’s tilting screen gains an edge for macro, landscape, and video uses.

Lens and Zoom Capability

Both cameras integrate fixed superzoom lenses, but their reach and aperture ranges differ considerably.

Canon's unrivaled 65x zoom range offers unmatched versatility, extending into super-telephoto territory essential for wildlife and sports, where distant subjects require tight framing. Nikon’s 18x zoom is respectable but falls short for distant wildlife or detailed landscape isolations.

Macro capabilities show Canon approaching zero focusing distance, enabling close-ups with good detail, albeit without dedicated macro optics or focus stacking. Nikon’s 4 cm macro minimum focusing distance is decent but not exceptional.

Optical image stabilization (OIS) in the Canon minimizes blur at long focal lengths, outperforming Nikon’s sensor-shift stabilization in real-world tests where slight handshake at zoom extremes degraded image sharpness.

Burst Rates and Buffer Performance

For action and sports photography, continuous shooting speed and buffer size are essential to capture decisive moments.

Nikon offers faster burst shooting at up to 10fps, but this is restricted to JPEGs and limited burst length. Canon, while slower at 6.4fps, supports continuous autofocus during shooting, improving the keeper rate on moving subjects. Buffer depth favors the Canon for sustained sequences.

Video Recording Capabilities

Video is often secondary in these cameras but matters to hybrid shooters.

Canon’s SX60 HS supports full HD at 60fps for smoother motion capture and includes a microphone port for improved audio quality, features absent on the Nikon. Optical IS aids video steadiness versus Nikon’s slightly less effective sensor-shift mechanism. The lack of 4K or higher resolutions is unsurprising given their generation.

Connectivity, Storage, and Power Considerations

Canon’s built-in Wi-Fi and NFC enable convenient image transfer and remote control - modern features enhancing workflow, while Nikon lacks wireless options. Battery life marginally favors Canon, a meaningful advantage during extended outings.

Price-to-Performance: Weighing the Investment

With typical street prices at approximately $549 for the Canon SX60 HS and $329 for Nikon’s S9100, the Canon commands a significant premium justified by superior zoom range, RAW support, articulating EVF, superior autofocus, and modern connectivity.

For buyers prioritizing ultimate telephoto reach, professional-level control, and video features, Canon represents stronger value despite higher cost. Nikon suits budget-conscious users placing compactness and casual shooting above versatility and control.

Use Case Evaluation: Who Benefits Most From Each Camera?

Portrait Photography

• Canon SX60 HS: Its 16MP sensor and RAW support enable richer skin tones and improved detail retention, with face detection in AF aiding sharp focus on eyes. The articulating screen facilitates creative angles and bokeh control benefits from the wide zoom range. While not an SLR, its manual aperture mode allows modest depth-of-field control.

• Nikon S9100: Limited to 12MP JPEGs, absence of manual exposure modes, and no EVF reduce precision in portrait work. But face detection aids casual snapshots.

Landscape Photography

• Canon’s higher resolution and improved dynamic range better capture tonal gradations and detail, while articulating screen and EVF enhance composition flexibility. The long zoom is less critical here; however, the camera’s modest weather resistance restricts shooting in harsh environments.

• Nikon performs adequately but with lower image quality ceiling and less compositional versatility.

Wildlife Photography

• Canon’s 65x zoom, continuous AF, and optical stabilization make it a clear winner for framing distant animals with sharp focus and minimized blur, despite modest buffer size.

• Nikon’s limited 18x zoom and absence of continuous AF reduce its effectiveness, though faster 10fps bursts could capture quick action, albeit with uncertain focus reliability.

Sports Photography

• Canon’s continuous AF and moderate burst rates offer realistic chances for crisp action shots. Its manual exposure modes enable adjustment under variable lighting.

• Nikon lacks continuous AF and manual exposure modes, impairing control and focus reliability during fast, unpredictable motion.

Street Photography

• Nikon’s smaller size and lighter weight aid discretion and portability - key for candid shooting in urban environments.

• Canon is bulkier and potentially more conspicuous but offers greater control for challenging lighting and creative framing via articulating screen.

Macro Photography

• Canon’s focus range down to zero and articulating screen help frame close-ups well, although no dedicated macro tools or focus bracketing.

• Nikon’s 4cm macro is respectable for casual close-ups.

Night and Astrophotography

• Canon’s low-light ISO performance extends to ISO 6400 (native); although noise is inherent to small sensors, RAW support helps noise reduction in post.

• Nikon’s max ISO of 3200 and aggressive noise reduction limit quality in dark conditions.

Video Capabilities

• Canon clearly dominates with 1080p60, microphone input, and optical stabilization producing smoother, more professional clips.

• Nikon limited to 30fps 1080p, no mic input, and sensor-shift stabilization.

Travel Photography

• Nikon’s compact size and relatively light weight favor travel portability.

• Canon’s size balanced by superior zoom versatility and connectivity, suitable for travelers prioritizing one camera for varied conditions.

Professional Applications

• Canon offers RAW support, manual modes, and reliable autofocus making it a viable secondary/pro-ready option in a pinch.

• Nikon lacks key pro features limiting serious workflow integration.

Sample Image Gallery

Real-world image comparisons highlight strengths and limitations of each.

Canon SX60 HS front Canon SX60 HS screen back Nikon S9100 front Nikon S9100 screen back

• Canon’s images show better detail retention, especially in foliage and fine textures, more natural skin tones, and less noise at higher ISOs.
• Nikon images appear softer with slight color shifts; useful for general snapshots but less for critical detail work.

Overall Scores and Genre-Specific Ratings

Industry benchmarking metrics (DXO scores available only for Canon) reflect performance differentials.

• Canon ranks higher for image quality, autofocus, and video.
• Nikon scores better for portability but lags in core photographic functions.

Conclusion: Which Camera Should You Choose?

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS is the comprehensive superzoom for enthusiasts and semi-pros valuing manual control, extended reach, and versatile shooting modes. Its articulating EVF, RAW capture, continuous AF, and superior video features justify the higher investment, especially for wildlife, sports, macro, and travel gigs that demand adaptability.

Nikon Coolpix S9100 suits casual photographers and travelers prioritizing small size, simplicity, and budget. While it lacks advanced controls and connectivity, it delivers dependable image quality for everyday snapshots and daylight environments, particularly benefiting users who place portability above zoom range or manual settings.

Final Recommendations

• For wildlife and sports photographers: Canon SX60 HS is the clear choice due to superior zoom, AF, and burst modes.
• For video-centric users: SX60 HS offers better frame rates and audio options.
• For casual travel and street shooters: Nikon S9100’s compactness and ease-of-use score higher.
• For photographers needing manual control and RAW flexibility: Canon SX60 HS.
• For budget-oriented buyers valuing pocketability: Nikon S9100.

Author’s Note

This comparison was compiled after extensive hands-on trials assessing image samples under controlled lighting, field use across various genres, and side-by-side technical measurements. Users new to superzoom compacts should be aware of inherent sensor size limitations affecting low-light and dynamic range, but carefully selecting based on primary use case and ergonomic preference will maximize satisfaction.

By examining both cameras from multiple perspectives, this article walks you through every critical aspect enabling an informed choice grounded in experience and technical understanding - not just specs. For those seeking ultimate zoom versatility and professional-style controls in a non-interchangeable lens body, the Canon PowerShot SX60 HS continues to stand out nearly a decade after its release. Meanwhile, Nikon’s Coolpix S9100 remains a viable lightweight option for everyday shooting without complexity.

Thank you for reading this thorough comparison. For further personalized advice on digital camera selections tailored to your specific photographic interests, feel free to consult in the comments or contact directly.

Happy shooting!

End of Article