Canon SX60 HS vs Nikon S9900
61 Imaging
40 Features
67 Overall
50
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Canon SX60 HS vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-1365mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 650g - 128 x 93 x 114mm
- Announced September 2014
- Earlier Model is Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Launched February 2015
- Succeeded the Nikon S9700
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX60 HS vs Nikon S9900 Overview
Here is a extended review of the Canon SX60 HS versus Nikon S9900, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the SX60 HS (16MP) and the S9900 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SX60 HS was launched 4 months before the S9900 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX60 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S9900 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the SX60 HS matches up vs the S9900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX60 HS vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX60 HS & Nikon Coolpix S9900. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX60 HS Gallery & Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX60 HS over the Nikon S9900
| SX60 HS | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 922k | 921k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Canon SX60 HS
| S9900 | SX60 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX60 HS and Nikon S9900
| SX60 HS | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 | February 2015 | Similar age | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX60 HS vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX60 HS enjoys external measurements of 128mm x 93mm x 114mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 4.5") having a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs) while the Nikon S9900 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX60 HS versus Nikon S9900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the SX60 HS compared to the S9900.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SX60 HS and S9900 is 61 and 88 respectively.
Canon SX60 HS vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading through specs. The visual here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX60 HS and S9900.
All in all, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of photos though you will need to consider the age of the products into consideration.
Canon SX60 HS vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX60 HS vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX60 HS | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Nikon |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX60 HS | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-09-16 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21-1365mm (65.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 922k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.4 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 650g (1.43 pounds) | 289g (0.64 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 128 x 93 x 114mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 4.5") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 39 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 19.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 127 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-10L | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $549 | $300 |