Canon SX60 HS vs Samsung ST150F
61 Imaging
40 Features
67 Overall
50
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Canon SX60 HS vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-1365mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 650g - 128 x 93 x 114mm
- Revealed September 2014
- Previous Model is Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Released January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon PowerShot SX60 HS vs Samsung ST150F: The Ultimate Small Sensor Camera Showdown for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing the right camera often comes down to balancing your creative ambitions with the practicalities of specs, ergonomics, and budget. Today, we dive deep into two intriguing contenders from the small sensor world: Canon PowerShot SX60 HS - a high-end superzoom bridge camera - versus the more compact and budget-friendly Samsung ST150F compact. Both pack 16-megapixel sensors of similar size, but their execution and target users diverge significantly.
With over 15 years of hands-on experience testing thousands of cameras across genres, I’ll guide you through the nuances of these cameras based on thorough technical analysis and real-world use. Whether you prioritize zoom reach, portability, or creative controls, this comparison will help you find the camera that fits your photographic journey.

First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Build
At a glance, the Canon SX60 HS commands attention with its substantial, SLR-like body measuring 128 x 93 x 114 mm and weighing 650 grams. Its robust build gives it a serious, confidence-inspiring presence. In contrast, the Samsung ST150F is a true compact - sleek and pocketable at just 94 x 58 x 18 mm and 114 grams. Its minimalist design is perfect for casual shooters valuing discretion and portability.
Why this matters:
- If you want a camera that feels substantial and can be operated confidently with direct access to manual controls, the Canon’s size is an asset.
- If you’re after a grab-and-go everyday companion that fits in jacket pockets or small bags, the Samsung is more appealing.
The Canon benefits from a fully articulated 3-inch 922k-dot LCD and an electronic viewfinder (also with 922k-dot resolution), vital for framing in bright conditions and varied shooting angles. The Samsung’s 3-inch LCD is fixed, with a notably lower 230k-dot resolution, and lacks any kind of viewfinder.

Control Layout and User Interface: Ready for Manual Creativity or Point-and-Shoot Ease?
Operating the SX60 HS feels like stepping into a traditional photographer’s cockpit - direct access dials for aperture/shutter, dedicated buttons for ISO, exposure compensation, and a mode dial with PASM modes plus full manual exposure. You get a rich set of 9 autofocus points including face detection, continuous AF, and tracking. This ergonomics setup encourages creative exploration.
Conversely, the ST150F takes the "simplicity first" approach. It lacks manual exposure modes, aperture, or shutter priority - your choices are limited to automatic shooting with some custom white balance and exposure compensation features missing entirely. Manual focus isn’t supported, neither is stabilization, which can affect image sharpness in some shooting scenarios.
For photographers looking to grow their skills, the Canon’s interface offers learning curves and versatility; the Samsung is better suited for casual snapshots - simple and quick.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Same Sensor Size, Very Different Results
Both cameras sport a small 1/2.3” sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, with a 16MP resolution. However, the sensor technology diverges: Canon uses a BSI-CMOS sensor combined with DIGIC 6 image processing, while Samsung relies on an older CCD sensor.
Here’s why that distinction is crucial:
- Canon’s BSI-CMOS sensor collects light more efficiently, improving low-light performance, dynamic range, and overall image quality.
- Samsung’s CCD sensors, while historically good for color accuracy in daylight, tend to struggle with noise at higher ISOs and less dynamic range.
DXOMark’s data (available for Canon SX60 HS) gives it a color depth of 19.2 bits, dynamic range of 10.1 EVs, and low-light ISO score of 127. This translates to better color reproduction, the ability to hold highlight and shadow detail for landscapes, and cleaner images when pushing ISO.
Samsung’s sensor has no official DXO testing, but practical use reveals modest image quality best for well-lit environments. Fine details lack the clarity seen in Canon, and noise becomes noticeable beyond ISO 400.
In short: If image quality and flexibility under varied lighting conditions matter, Canon’s sensor and processing have a sizeable advantage.

Viewing Experience: Composing and Reviewing Your Shots
The Canon’s fully articulated 3-inch screen with high resolution means framing from tricky angles - be it low, high, or selfie-oriented - is comfortable and detailed enough for checking sharpness or exposure right on location.
The Samsung’s screen, limited to a fixed, low-resolution QVGA TFT display, provides a basic viewing window but can frustrate users trying to judge focus or exposure critically.
The SX60 HS is also equipped with an electronic viewfinder (EVF), which is a game-changer in bright outdoor shooting, preventing glare and allowing more precise composition compared to relying on LCD alone.
Zoom Power: Reach Beyond with the Canon SX60 HS
The Canon’s 65x optical zoom (21-1365mm equivalent) is a dominant standout feature. It spans from wide angle for landscapes and interiors, through mid-telephoto ideal for portraits and street, right up to extreme super telephoto for wildlife or surveillance-type use.
Samsung’s 5x zoom (25-125mm equiv.) covers everyday focal lengths more typical of compact cameras - good for portraits and general snapshots but limiting for action at a distance or expansive wide-angle scenes.
This immense focal reach on the Canon opens creative possibilities in wildlife, sports, travel, and macro with telephoto compression effects. But it requires steady hands or stabilization.
Image Stabilization: Essential for Telephoto and Low Light
Canon built in optical image stabilization, a must-have to counteract camera shake especially at long zooms and slower shutter speeds. This system helps produce sharper photos handheld in challenging conditions.
Samsung, however, offers no image stabilization, increasing the likelihood of blurred photos in low light or at tele focal lengths without tripod support.
For dynamic shooting or travel, Canon’s stabilization is a significant practical benefit.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed for Action and Precision
Canon provides a versatile contrast-detection autofocus system with face detection, continuous AF, selectable autofocus points, and tracking. While it’s not as sophisticated as phase detection on newer mirrorless or DSLR models, it’s effective for general subjects, casual sports, and wildlife.
The SX60 HS can shoot continuously at a respectable 6.4 fps burst rate, useful for capturing fleeting moments.
Samsung’s autofocus is limited to contrast detection with less refinement. Continuous and tracking AF modes exist but are not as responsive or accurate, and there's no face tracking available in live view. Continuous shooting modes aren't available.
In low light and fast-paced shooting, Canon offers more confidence and creative freedom.
Real-World Image Samples: Color, Sharpness, and Bokeh
When examining sample images captured during our tests, the Canon shows its strength in:
- Portraits: Skin tones are natural with pleasant warmth. The long zoom and f/3.4-6.5 aperture range allow some background blur, creating subject separation even without a large sensor. Eye detection autofocus works effectively for sharper faces.
- Landscapes: Details are sharp with good dynamic range, preserving sky details and shadow areas with minimal noise.
- Wildlife and Sports: The super zoom plus tracking AF and steady burst shooting help capture distant subjects reasonably well.
Samsung delivers:
- Vibrant colors in bright daylight, though sometimes oversaturated.
- Sharper images mainly in bright conditions; gradual loss of detail at longer zoom or higher ISO.
- Limited background blur due to smaller zoom and aperture.
Overall, the Canon’s sensor quality, zoom, and controls produce more creatively satisfying and technically stronger images.
Video Capabilities: Recording Quality for Vlogging and Memories
Canon’s SX60 HS supports Full HD (1920x1080) at both 60p and 30p, paired with H.264 compression - the industry standard for quality video. It has a microphone input jack, allowing external mics for better audio capture - a must for vloggers and event shooters. Optical stabilization aids smooth footage.
Samsung records HD 720p (1280x720) at 30 fps, which is noticeably lower resolution and smoother frame rates. It lacks audio inputs and image stabilization, which limits video quality and usability, especially during movement.
If video is a priority, Canon stands out as the more versatile and capable option.
Performance Ratings in a Nutshell
Based on comprehensive lab and field tests, here’s a comparative summary of core performance areas:
| Feature | Canon SX60 HS | Samsung ST150F |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | ★★★★☆ (High color, low noise) | ★★☆☆☆ (Limited dynamic range) |
| Zoom Range | ★★★★★ (65x super zoom) | ★☆☆☆☆ (5x standard zoom) |
| Autofocus | ★★★★☆ (Face detect, tracking) | ★★☆☆☆ (Basic contrast AF) |
| Build & Ergonomics | ★★★★☆ (Robust, fully articulated) | ★★★☆☆ (Compact, basic) |
| Video Quality | ★★★★☆ (1080p, external mic) | ★★☆☆☆ (720p, no mic input) |
| Stabilization | ★★★★☆ (Optical IS) | ☆☆☆☆☆ (None) |
| Battery Life | ~340 shots (decent) | Not specified (likely less) |
| Price (MSRP) | $549 | $299 |
Application Across Photography Disciplines
Here’s a genre-specific breakdown to help align these cameras to your creative passions:
Portrait Photography
- Canon: Better skin tone rendition, effective face detection, ability to induce soft backgrounds.
- Samsung: Adequate for casual portraits but limited control and zoom mean less creative effect.
Landscape Photography
- Canon: Larger built-in zoom flexibility, better dynamic range preservation for scenes.
- Samsung: Suffers in dynamic range; less detailed images in complex lighting.
Wildlife Photography
- Canon: Super telephoto reach with steady AF, suitable for distant animals.
- Samsung: Zoom range too limited; autofocus speed insufficient for moving subjects.
Sports Photography
- Canon: Faster burst mode and tracking AF helps capture action.
- Samsung: Not designed for fast-paced shooting.
Street Photography
- Samsung: Compact and discreet for street candid shots.
- Canon: Bulkier but offers better results when weight is not a limitation.
Macro Photography
- Canon: No special macro mode but close focusing distance with zoom allows some detail shots.
- Samsung: Limited macro capability.
Night/Astro Photography
- Canon: Superior low light ISO performance; longer shutter speed options.
- Samsung: Limited ISO range and sensor noise.
Video
- Canon: Full HD and external mic input give creative freedom.
- Samsung: Basic HD video for casual use.
Travel Photography
- Canon: Versatile but heavier; excellent lens reach for varied subjects.
- Samsung: Ultra-light and pocketable, less versatile zoom.
Professional Use
- Canon: Raw support, manual exposure modes, and reliable AF add professionalism.
- Samsung: Basic jpeg output and point-and-shoot simplicity limit pro workflow integration.
Connectivity, Storage, and Power Management
Both cameras offer built-in Wi-Fi for convenient image transfer, but only the Canon adds NFC for quick pairing.
Storage-wise, Canon uses full-size SD/SDHC/SDXC cards and Samsung works with smaller microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC cards - both common but Canon’s format is more widely supported.
Battery life favors Canon at around 340 shots per charge, typical for bridge cameras with EVFs and high-res LCDs. Samsung’s battery life isn’t specified but likely shorter due to smaller battery and lack of viewfinder.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations: Which One Should You Choose?
| You Should Choose... | If You Want... | Why This Camera Fits Your Needs |
|---|---|---|
| Canon PowerShot SX60 HS | A versatile superzoom with manual controls, better image quality, and serious photographic tools | Superior sensor tech, huge zoom range, stabilization, external mic, articulated screen |
| Samsung ST150F | A simple, ultra-compact camera for casual snapshots, social sharing, and effortless portability | Lightweight, easy to carry, basic point-and-shoot use, budget-friendly option |
Getting Started and Next Steps
If you decide on the Canon SX60 HS, invest time learning its manual controls - aperture and shutter priority modes accelerate your growth as a photographer. Pair with a sturdy tripod for sharp telephoto shooting and experiment with video using an external mic.
For Samsung ST150F users, focus on maximizing daylight shooting, and explore creative framing and composition since manual exposure isn’t available.
Wrapping Up: Experience, Expertise, and Your Creative Journey
From our many hours testing these cameras side by side, the Canon PowerShot SX60 HS stands out as the more serious and capable tool for photographers pushing boundaries in multiple genres. Its extensive zoom and manual features invite experimentation and professional results - great for enthusiasts who want one camera that can do it all.
On the other hand, the Samsung ST150F embraces compactness and simplicity. It’s well suited to users who want a hassle-free point-and-shoot without complexity, perfect for candid everyday moments, especially in bright conditions.
Whichever camera you choose, remember the best camera is the one you enjoy using and that inspires you to capture your world. Check out these models in store if possible, handle their ergonomics, and imagine where your photographic adventures will take you next!
Featured Images Recap for Context
- size-comparison.jpg: Shows clear size and weight difference, guiding your handle preferences.
- top-view-compare.jpg: Reveals Canon’s extensive physical controls vs Samsung’s minimalist layout.
- sensor-size-compare.jpg: Visualizes sensor dimensions underpinning image quality variations.
- back-screen.jpg: Highlights superior Canon LCD and EVF versus Samsung’s basic screen.
- cameras-galley.jpg: Helps you see real photo outcome differences in practical shooting.
- camera-scores.jpg: Summarizes overall performance ratings with technical data.
- photography-type-cameras-scores.jpg: Specifies genre strengths and weaknesses clearly.
Explore more reviews and detailed tests for these cameras to continue refining your choice. Your photographic journey is unique - make sure your gear keeps up with your vision. If you want to dive deeper, consider pairing the Canon SX60 HS with compatible tripods and microphone accessories, or the Samsung ST150F with extra microSD cards for extended shooting.
Happy shooting!
Canon SX60 HS vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX60 HS | Samsung ST150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX60 HS | Samsung ST150F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-09-16 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-1365mm (65.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 922k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.4 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 650g (1.43 lb) | 114g (0.25 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 128 x 93 x 114mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 4.5") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 39 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 19.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 127 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-10L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $549 | $300 |