Canon SX600 HS vs Kodak Z990
93 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed75d/ed75d720351d7f2d1aa386cb9bf85cdfdfd12d75" alt="Canon PowerShot SX600 HS front Canon PowerShot SX600 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9232/e92328f7879ab167afbf88f2f8a3bd1e3b73fcb4" alt="Kodak EasyShare Z990 front Kodak EasyShare Z990 front"
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Canon SX600 HS vs Kodak Z990 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1280 video
- 25-450mm (F3.8-6.9) lens
- 188g - 104 x 61 x 26mm
- Released January 2014
- Renewed by Canon SX610 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Also referred to as EasyShare Max
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX600 HS vs Kodak Z990 Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Canon SX600 HS versus Kodak Z990, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Canon and Kodak. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the SX600 HS (16MP) and Z990 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The SX600 HS was launched 3 years after the Z990 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX600 HS being a Compact camera and the Kodak Z990 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the SX600 HS matches up versus the Z990 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon SX600 HS vs Kodak Z990 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX600 HS and Kodak EasyShare Z990. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX600 HS Gallery and Kodak Z990 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX600 HS over the Kodak Z990
SX600 HS | Z990 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 37 months |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Canon SX600 HS
Z990 | SX600 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX600 HS and Kodak Z990
SX600 HS | Z990 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Canon SX600 HS vs Kodak Z990 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX600 HS offers outer measurements of 104mm x 61mm x 26mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.0") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Kodak Z990 has proportions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX600 HS versus Kodak Z990 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the SX600 HS against the Z990.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b296/4b296645986f1f8fc37cd66ea02ae877c317b8b2" alt="Canon SX600 HS vs Kodak Z990 size comparison Canon SX600 HS vs Kodak Z990 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX600 HS and Z990 is 93 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82958/8295817a83d2218f45d62d115e5f0f8b77667ae8" alt="Canon SX600 HS vs Kodak Z990 top view buttons comparison Canon SX600 HS vs Kodak Z990 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX600 HS vs Kodak Z990 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The image underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SX600 HS and Z990.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Canon SX600 HS to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent SX600 HS provides an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87870/87870dc1b6999d5447116fbe1dd80241399cadf7" alt="Canon SX600 HS vs Kodak Z990 sensor size comparison Canon SX600 HS vs Kodak Z990 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX600 HS vs Kodak Z990 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0b86/f0b865fa57d3e8553ba6a10aa3f54f70557ffce9" alt="Canon SX600 HS vs Kodak Z990 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX600 HS vs Kodak Z990 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX600 HS vs Kodak Z990 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX600 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Kodak |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX600 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z990 |
Other name | - | EasyShare Max |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2014-01-06 | 2011-01-04 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 4+ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.8-6.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | PureColor II G (TFT) | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m (50 cm � 3.5 m (W) / 1.0 m � 2.0 m (T)) | 8.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, Manual Flash On / Off, Slow Synchro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1280 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1280 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 188 gr (0.41 lb) | 445 gr (0.98 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 61 x 26mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.0") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-6LH | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $249 | $299 |