Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P310
93 Imaging
39 Features
45 Overall
41
92 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1280 video
- 25-450mm (F3.8-6.9) lens
- 188g - 104 x 61 x 26mm
- Released January 2014
- Renewed by Canon SX610 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 194g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Introduced June 2012
- Superseded the Nikon P300
- New Model is Nikon P330
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P310 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P310, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the SX600 HS (16MP) and the P310 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX600 HS was manufactured 19 months later than the P310 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the SX600 HS matches up against the P310 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P310 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX600 HS and Nikon Coolpix P310. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX600 HS Gallery and Nikon P310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX600 HS over the Nikon P310
| SX600 HS | P310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 | June 2012 | More recent by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Nikon P310 over the Canon SX600 HS
| P310 | SX600 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 921k | 461k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX600 HS and Nikon P310
| SX600 HS | P310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P310 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX600 HS has external dimensions of 104mm x 61mm x 26mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.0") and a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Nikon P310 has proportions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P310 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the SX600 HS and the P310.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SX600 HS and P310 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P310 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out specs. The graphic here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SX600 HS and P310.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP and you should expect comparable quality of images however you will want to take the release date of the cameras into account. The fresher SX600 HS should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P310 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P310 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX600 HS | Nikon Coolpix P310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Nikon |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX600 HS | Nikon Coolpix P310 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-01-06 | 2012-06-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 99 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-100mm (4.2x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.8-6.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II G (TFT) | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m (50 cm � 3.5 m (W) / 1.0 m � 2.0 m (T)) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Manual Flash On / Off, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1280 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1280 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 188 gr (0.41 lbs) | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 61 x 26mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.0") | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 photos | 230 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $249 | $700 |