Canon SX610 HS vs Olympus TG-320
Portability
93 Imaging
46 Features
47 Overall
46
93 Imaging
46 Features
47 Overall
46
Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Canon SX610 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
Canon SX610 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.8-6.9) lens
- 191g - 105 x 61 x 27mm
- Announced January 2015
- Superseded the Canon SX600 HS
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX610 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Canon SX610 HS and Olympus TG-320, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the SX610 HS (20MP) and TG-320 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX610 HS was unveiled 3 years after the TG-320 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the SX610 HS scores vs the TG-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX610 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX610 HS and Olympus TG-320. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX610 HS Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX610 HS over the Olympus TG-320
| SX610 HS | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2015 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 37 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Canon SX610 HS
| TG-320 | SX610 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX610 HS and Olympus TG-320
| SX610 HS | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX610 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX610 HS features external dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 27mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 191 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Canon SX610 HS and Olympus TG-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the SX610 HS compared to the TG-320.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SX610 HS and TG-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX610 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at a spec sheet. The picture here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX610 HS and TG-320.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should count on the Canon SX610 HS to give extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher SX610 HS should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Canon SX610 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon SX610 HS
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-320
manual focus
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
has face detection focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
includes face detect focus
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Canon SX610 HS Street photography info
Olympus TG-320 Street photography info
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (191g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than competition (155g)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon SX610 HS
Sports photography with Olympus TG-320
long zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
has tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (2.5 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low battery life (270 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
includes tracking focus
environment sealing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (150 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon SX610 HS
Travel photography with Olympus TG-320
lighter than competition (191 grams)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
long reach (450mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
low battery life (270 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.8)
lighter than competition (155g)
environment sealing
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery life (150 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Canon SX610 HS Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography factors
manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.8)
no manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
low battery life (270 shots)
lack of Timelapse mode
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
terrible battery life (150 shots)
does not have Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Canon SX610 HS Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging advice
reasonably wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (191 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of external microphone socket
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
lighter than competition (155g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX610 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX610 HS | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX610 HS | Olympus TG-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2015-01-06 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 4+ | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.8-6.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.5 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 191 grams (0.42 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 27mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 shots | 150 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $214 | $0 |
