Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z2000
93 Imaging
46 Features
48 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b94e/5b94e199db324e5d3b97ed7f93ac78ec9cf6a3ca" alt="Canon PowerShot SX620 HS front Canon PowerShot SX620 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0432c/0432c2469e23261c9ab749c21576d50b3e114a13" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-625mm (F3.2-6.6) lens
- 182g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Launched May 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z2000 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Canon SX620 HS and Casio EX-Z2000, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Casio. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the SX620 HS (20MP) and EX-Z2000 (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SX620 HS was brought out 6 years later than the EX-Z2000 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX620 HS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the SX620 HS scores against the EX-Z2000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX620 HS and Casio Exilim EX-Z2000. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX620 HS Gallery and Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX620 HS over the Casio EX-Z2000
SX620 HS | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2016 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 78 months |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Canon SX620 HS
EX-Z2000 | SX620 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX620 HS and Casio EX-Z2000
SX620 HS | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z2000 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon SX620 HS has got outside dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z2000 has measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX620 HS and Casio EX-Z2000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the SX620 HS compared to the EX-Z2000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2afd/a2afdf4d6aeaa6b0fc15e948376a5b05ebc1bdd8" alt="Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z2000 size comparison Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z2000 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX620 HS and EX-Z2000 is 93 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13929/13929903e41202f7656894068c46375ae35459e8" alt="Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z2000 top view buttons comparison Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z2000 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z2000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements only by checking out specifications. The graphic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX620 HS and EX-Z2000.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Canon SX620 HS to produce greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The fresher SX620 HS provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aea70/aea70ff3c02a738461b6d159d7c9a8d995f77f5b" alt="Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z2000 sensor size comparison Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z2000 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z2000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d44a/8d44a6010a14208de3b75ce5f8a3505a09697188" alt="Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z2000 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Casio |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX620 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2016-05-10 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 4+ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-625mm (25.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-6.6 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.5 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182 grams (0.40 lb) | 152 grams (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 295 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | NP-110 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $279 | $0 |