Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z29
93 Imaging
46 Features
48 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b94e/5b94e199db324e5d3b97ed7f93ac78ec9cf6a3ca" alt="Canon PowerShot SX620 HS front Canon PowerShot SX620 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0437/a0437e95868fdb9882430b06422f97671066c771" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z29 front Casio Exilim EX-Z29 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
19 Overall
27
Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z29 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-625mm (F3.2-6.6) lens
- 182g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Announced May 2016
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Released March 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z29 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon SX620 HS versus Casio EX-Z29, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Canon and Casio. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SX620 HS (20MP) and EX-Z29 (10MP) and the SX620 HS (1/2.3") and EX-Z29 (1/2.5") feature totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The SX620 HS was manufactured 7 years later than the EX-Z29 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX620 HS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the SX620 HS grades vs the EX-Z29 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z29 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX620 HS & Casio Exilim EX-Z29. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX620 HS Gallery & Casio EX-Z29 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX620 HS over the Casio EX-Z29
SX620 HS | EX-Z29 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2016 | ![]() | March 2009 | Fresher by 88 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Canon SX620 HS
EX-Z29 | SX620 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX620 HS and Casio EX-Z29
SX620 HS | EX-Z29 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z29 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Canon SX620 HS comes with outer measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z29 has specifications of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Canon SX620 HS versus Casio EX-Z29 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the SX620 HS vs the EX-Z29.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1c6/7e1c6c35a6027a29952398eded7ae165dd1aeab7" alt="Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z29 size comparison Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z29 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SX620 HS and EX-Z29 is 93 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b8b3/1b8b38b5b81f9e4ce21f166e5396b089b82e6ea9" alt="Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z29 top view buttons comparison Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z29 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z29 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX620 HS and EX-Z29.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SX620 HS because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Canon SX620 HS will give you extra detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher SX620 HS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bb62/7bb62e6766d8a55e5bbb5d2ce7000a207c163524" alt="Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z29 sensor size comparison Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z29 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z29 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3201/c32010a0319cfaaddfec456303f24c1e29be9af8" alt="Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z29 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z29 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon SX620 HS vs Casio EX-Z29 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Casio |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX620 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2016-05-10 | 2009-03-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 4+ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-625mm (25.0x) | 38-113mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-6.6 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.5 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 2.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 pounds) | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) |
Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 295 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | NP-60 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SDHC / SD Memory Card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $279 | $79 |