Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
Portability
93 Imaging
46 Features
48 Overall
46
93 Imaging
46 Features
48 Overall
46
Portability
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
Canon SX620 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-625mm (F3.2-6.6) lens
- 182g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced May 2016
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Canon SX620 HS and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX620 HS (20MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX620 HS was launched 4 years after the TG-820 iHS which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SX620 HS matches up vs the TG-820 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX620 HS & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX620 HS Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX620 HS over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| SX620 HS | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2016 |  | February 2012 | Newer by 52 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Canon SX620 HS
| TG-820 iHS | SX620 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 922k | Clearer display (+108k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX620 HS and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| SX620 HS | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX620 HS has got exterior measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX620 HS and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the SX620 HS vs the TG-820 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SX620 HS and TG-820 iHS is 93 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions just by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX620 HS and TG-820 iHS.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Canon SX620 HS to show greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images way more aggressively. The more recent SX620 HS is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX620 HS Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography factors
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
has face detect focusing
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
provides face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX620 HS
Street photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (182 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon SX620 HS
Sports photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
excellent zoom range (25-625mm 25.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
has tracking focus
slow fps (2.5 frames per second)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking focus
environment proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (220 per charge)
lacks phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Canon SX620 HS Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography highlights
lighter than others in class (182g)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
long zoom (625mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
environment proofing
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
not so great battery power (220 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Canon SX620 HS Landscape photography features
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography features
manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
rather wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
no manual mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
not so great battery power (220 shots)
does not have Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Canon SX620 HS as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Vlogging camera
rather wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (182 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone port
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX620 HS | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX620 HS | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2016-05-10 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 4+ | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-625mm (25.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-6.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 1,030k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.5fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lbs) | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 295 photographs | 220 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $279 | $500 |