Canon SX70 HS vs Fujifilm F900EXR
63 Imaging
47 Features
67 Overall
55
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Canon SX70 HS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 21-1365mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 608g - 127 x 91 x 117mm
- Released September 2018
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Launched January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
Canon SX70 HS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Overview
Here is a in-depth comparison of the Canon SX70 HS vs Fujifilm F900EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the SX70 HS (20MP) and Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the SX70 HS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") have totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SX70 HS was announced 5 years later than the Fujifilm F900EXR and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX70 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Fujifilm F900EXR being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the SX70 HS matches up vs the Fujifilm F900EXR in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Canon SX70 HS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX70 HS & Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX70 HS Gallery & Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX70 HS over the Fujifilm F900EXR
SX70 HS | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2018 | January 2013 | Fresher by 69 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 922k | 920k | Sharper display (+2k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Canon SX70 HS
Fujifilm F900EXR | SX70 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX70 HS and Fujifilm F900EXR
SX70 HS | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Canon SX70 HS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Canon SX70 HS has physical measurements of 127mm x 91mm x 117mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 4.6") along with a weight of 608 grams (1.34 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F900EXR has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Canon SX70 HS vs Fujifilm F900EXR in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the SX70 HS versus the Fujifilm F900EXR.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX70 HS and Fujifilm F900EXR is 63 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX70 HS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor sizing simply by checking specs. The graphic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX70 HS and Fujifilm F900EXR.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SX70 HS with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Canon SX70 HS will resolve greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The fresher SX70 HS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX70 HS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX70 HS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX70 HS | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX70 HS | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2018-09-20 | 2013-01-30 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 8 | EXR II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-1365mm (65.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focus range | 0cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
Flash modes | Auto, on, slow sync, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 608g (1.34 lb) | 232g (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 127 x 91 x 117mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 4.6") | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photographs | 260 photographs |
Battery style | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $550 | $380 |