Canon SX70 HS vs Olympus VR-320
63 Imaging
47 Features
67 Overall
55
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Canon SX70 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 21-1365mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 608g - 127 x 91 x 117mm
- Introduced September 2018
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Renewed by Olympus VR-330
Canon SX70 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
The following is a extended review of the Canon SX70 HS vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the SX70 HS (20MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX70 HS was announced 7 years after the VR-320 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Canon SX70 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SX70 HS grades against the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon SX70 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX70 HS & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX70 HS Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX70 HS over the Olympus VR-320
SX70 HS | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2018 | July 2011 | Newer by 88 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Canon SX70 HS
VR-320 | SX70 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX70 HS and Olympus VR-320
SX70 HS | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Canon SX70 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon SX70 HS offers exterior measurements of 127mm x 91mm x 117mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 4.6") having a weight of 608 grams (1.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Canon SX70 HS vs Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the SX70 HS against the VR-320.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX70 HS and VR-320 is 63 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX70 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions only by going through specifications. The pic underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX70 HS and VR-320.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Canon SX70 HS to provide more detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively. The more recent SX70 HS will have an edge in sensor tech.
Canon SX70 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX70 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX70 HS | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX70 HS | Olympus VR-320 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2018-09-20 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 8 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-1365mm (65.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 0cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 922k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow sync, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 608 grams (1.34 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 127 x 91 x 117mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 4.6") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 shots | - |
Battery style | Built-in | - |
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $550 | $179 |