Canon SX70 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1
63 Imaging
46 Features
67 Overall
54
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Canon SX70 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 21-1365mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 608g - 127 x 91 x 117mm
- Introduced September 2018
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX70 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Canon SX70 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the SX70 HS (20MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX70 HS was introduced 4 years after the WG-M1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX70 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the SX70 HS matches up versus the WG-M1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX70 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX70 HS & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX70 HS Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX70 HS over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SX70 HS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2018 | September 2014 | More modern by 49 months | |
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 115k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Canon SX70 HS
| WG-M1 | SX70 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX70 HS and Ricoh WG-M1
| SX70 HS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Canon SX70 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Canon SX70 HS features external measurements of 127mm x 91mm x 117mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 4.6") with a weight of 608 grams (1.34 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX70 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the SX70 HS vs the WG-M1.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SX70 HS and WG-M1 is 63 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX70 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through specifications. The image below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX70 HS and WG-M1.
To sum up, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Canon SX70 HS to provide you with extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent SX70 HS should have an edge in sensor tech.
Canon SX70 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX70 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX70 HS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX70 HS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2018-09-20 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 8 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-1365mm (65.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, on, slow sync, off | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 608 gr (1.34 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 127 x 91 x 117mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 4.6") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photographs | 350 photographs |
| Battery style | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $550 | $2,000 |