Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung WB210
63 Imaging
48 Features
67 Overall
55
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 21-1365mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 608g - 127 x 91 x 117mm
- Revealed September 2018
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced July 2011
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the SX70 HS (20MP) and WB210 (14MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX70 HS was unveiled 7 years later than the WB210 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX70 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the SX70 HS matches up against the WB210 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX70 HS and Samsung WB210. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX70 HS Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX70 HS over the Samsung WB210
| SX70 HS | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2018 |  | July 2011 | More recent by 88 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 1k | Clearer display (+921k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Canon SX70 HS
| WB210 | SX70 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX70 HS and Samsung WB210
| SX70 HS | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus |
Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Canon SX70 HS comes with outer measurements of 127mm x 91mm x 117mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 4.6") having a weight of 608 grams (1.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB210 has specifications of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung WB210 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the SX70 HS vs the WB210.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SX70 HS and WB210 is 63 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SX70 HS and WB210.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Canon SX70 HS to give you extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The younger SX70 HS should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX70 HS | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX70 HS | Samsung WB210 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2018-09-20 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 8 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-1365mm (65.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow sync, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 608 grams (1.34 lb) | 174 grams (0.38 lb) |
| Dimensions | 127 x 91 x 117mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 4.6") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Built-in | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $550 | $279 |
