Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140
89 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e2e/b7e2ea3675c628e3e45868298e2b3be651a423db" alt="Canon PowerShot SX700 HS front Canon PowerShot SX700 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bc98/2bc987d313a2b11dbf5e21477ab9c55da3f6ebd7" alt="Kodak EasyShare C140 front Kodak EasyShare C140 front"
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 269g - 113 x 66 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Replacement is Canon SX710 HS
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Kodak. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the SX700 HS (16MP) and C140 (8MP) and the SX700 HS (1/2.3") and C140 (1/2.5") enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The SX700 HS was manufactured 5 years later than the C140 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the SX700 HS scores vs the C140 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX700 HS & Kodak EasyShare C140. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX700 HS Gallery & Kodak C140 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX700 HS over the Kodak C140
SX700 HS | C140 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 63 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Canon SX700 HS
C140 | SX700 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX700 HS and Kodak C140
SX700 HS | C140 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Canon SX700 HS offers outer measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Kodak C140 has specifications of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the SX700 HS vs the C140.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d12d/1d12d3ccc3d9162977363b8bbde8716b0bb4a8c6" alt="Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140 size comparison Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SX700 HS and C140 is 89 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d033/4d033f7054ca3168e7f11db1798b71272be5ce31" alt="Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140 top view buttons comparison Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing specs. The graphic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SX700 HS and C140.
All in all, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SX700 HS because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Canon SX700 HS will provide greater detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The newer SX700 HS should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ded9/5ded946a7411de3eedd37076be74019be2f32566" alt="Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140 sensor size comparison Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/270f4/270f40ecafedea1ed0f10f725f90e15996890346" alt="Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX700 HS vs Kodak C140 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX700 HS | Kodak EasyShare C140 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Kodak |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX700 HS | Kodak EasyShare C140 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-02-12 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3264 x 2448 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/2.7-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 13cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | PureColor II G TFT | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lb) | 160 grams (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-6LH | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $349 | $80 |