Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ
89 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e2e/b7e2ea3675c628e3e45868298e2b3be651a423db" alt="Canon PowerShot SX700 HS front Canon PowerShot SX700 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 269g - 113 x 66 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Replacement is Canon SX710 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Canon SX700 HS and Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the SX700 HS (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SX700 HS was released 5 years after the SP-565UZ which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the SX700 HS grades against the SP-565UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX700 HS & Olympus SP-565UZ. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX700 HS Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX700 HS over the Olympus SP-565UZ
SX700 HS | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 62 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Canon SX700 HS
SP-565UZ | SX700 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX700 HS and Olympus SP-565UZ
SX700 HS | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX700 HS provides external measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX700 HS and Olympus SP-565UZ in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the SX700 HS vs the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1a02/d1a0288411fabcad68c457303fb21d1ce60c3312" alt="Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SX700 HS and SP-565UZ is 89 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fad7a/fad7a0ba75c59e33416ba9dfae58970f8ba9e21f" alt="Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by checking specifications. The pic below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX700 HS and SP-565UZ.
To sum up, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Canon SX700 HS to give greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern SX700 HS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58366/58366f5ee3dc263233254ef4bc13384c1f6319a6" alt="Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad766/ad7668c5425c2e3124305cf2d0db15aa90e6e3f3" alt="Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX700 HS | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX700 HS | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-02-12 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | PureColor II G TFT | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 1 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-6LH | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $349 | $400 |