Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
89 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e2e/b7e2ea3675c628e3e45868298e2b3be651a423db" alt="Canon PowerShot SX700 HS front Canon PowerShot SX700 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 269g - 113 x 66 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Successor is Canon SX710 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Canon SX700 HS and Olympus TG-830 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SX700 HS (16MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SX700 HS was manufactured 14 months later than the TG-830 iHS which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the SX700 HS grades against the TG-830 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX700 HS & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX700 HS Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX700 HS over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
SX700 HS | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 14 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Canon SX700 HS
TG-830 iHS | SX700 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX700 HS and Olympus TG-830 iHS
SX700 HS | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Canon SX700 HS enjoys external dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has specifications of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Canon SX700 HS and Olympus TG-830 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the SX700 HS versus the TG-830 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c07b/8c07be1fa6a511f0a1f845eb2978a51dc8f7c83b" alt="Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX700 HS and TG-830 iHS is 89 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a123/7a123980649bb5dce0b41c3862b55d110b289cd2" alt="Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing simply by viewing specs. The photograph underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX700 HS and TG-830 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photographs however you have to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The younger SX700 HS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8f3e/d8f3e890f5aee9dc09a29d4b2471a393fd02fb05" alt="Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison"
Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b3e1/8b3e1de1e4d0df30796eadde8e6e6ad83f438146" alt="Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX700 HS | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX700 HS | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2014-02-12 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | PureColor II G TFT | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 pictures | 300 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-6LH | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $349 | $0 |