Canon SX700 HS vs Ricoh WG-80
89 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Canon SX700 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 269g - 113 x 66 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2014
- New Model is Canon SX710 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2022
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-70
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX700 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Canon SX700 HS versus Ricoh WG-80, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SX700 HS (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX700 HS was launched 9 years earlier than the WG-80 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SX700 HS matches up against the WG-80 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX700 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX700 HS & Ricoh WG-80. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX700 HS Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX700 HS over the Ricoh WG-80
| SX700 HS | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Canon SX700 HS
| WG-80 | SX700 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2022 | February 2014 | Fresher by 100 months |
Common features in the Canon SX700 HS and Ricoh WG-80
| SX700 HS | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Canon SX700 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Canon SX700 HS comes with exterior dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Canon SX700 HS versus Ricoh WG-80 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the SX700 HS vs the WG-80.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX700 HS and WG-80 is 89 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX700 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SX700 HS and WG-80.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of files though you may want to consider the age of the products into consideration. The older SX700 HS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX700 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX700 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX700 HS | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX700 HS | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2014-02-12 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.70 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II G TFT | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photos | 300 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $349 | $300 |