Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270
89 Imaging
45 Features
51 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/428ba/428ba7c3b1b646021aacf72fa800d1d0b69e2fe7" alt="Canon PowerShot SX710 HS front Canon PowerShot SX710 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5da/be5da3e0d8c97d11812a2fa106de287a4829ce6f" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front"
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 269g - 113 x 66 x 35mm
- Released January 2015
- Replaced the Canon SX700 HS
- Refreshed by Canon SX720 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 Overview
Let's look closer at the Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Canon and Casio. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX710 HS (20MP) and EX-Z270 (10MP) and the SX710 HS (1/2.3") and EX-Z270 (1/2.5") offer totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The SX710 HS was revealed 6 years later than the EX-Z270 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX710 HS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the SX710 HS scores vs the EX-Z270 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX710 HS and Casio Exilim EX-Z270. The full galleries are available at Canon SX710 HS Gallery and Casio EX-Z270 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX710 HS over the Casio EX-Z270
SX710 HS | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2015 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 73 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Canon SX710 HS
EX-Z270 | SX710 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX710 HS and Casio EX-Z270
SX710 HS | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX710 HS enjoys external dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z270 has dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SX710 HS against the EX-Z270.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62046/6204624fb230f2d4b70b8ca459234b219515e9cf" alt="Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 size comparison Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SX710 HS and EX-Z270 is 89 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9755/d9755e37620983fd7fb9666d77d664091a2da1b4" alt="Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 top view buttons comparison Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by seeing specs. The visual underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX710 HS and EX-Z270.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SX710 HS having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Canon SX710 HS will produce more detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent SX710 HS will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9685/f96855612bbec1d3e9579ad518d8976375923907" alt="Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 sensor size comparison Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8f3b/a8f3bd8de5876298b575c8cb03ad1941f1ee3c53" alt="Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX710 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Casio |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX710 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2015-01-06 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/2.6-7.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 922k dots | 115k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lb) | 111 grams (0.24 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6LH | NP-80 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $349 | $0 |