Clicky

Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
89 Imaging
45 Features
51 Overall
47
Canon PowerShot SX710 HS front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35

Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Canon SX710 HS
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-750mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
  • 269g - 113 x 66 x 35mm
  • Launched January 2015
  • Earlier Model is Canon SX700 HS
  • Newer Model is Canon SX720 HS
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Canon SX710 HS and Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the SX710 HS (20MP) and TG-320 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The SX710 HS was introduced 3 years later than the TG-320 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the SX710 HS grades vs the TG-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Canon SX710 HS over the Olympus TG-320

          

          

            
 SX710 HS TG-320 
RevealedJanuary 2015January 2012Fresher by 37 months
Focus manually  More accurate focus
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution922k230kClearer display (+692k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Canon SX710 HS

          

          

            
 TG-320 SX710 HS 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Canon SX710 HS and Olympus TG-320

          

          

            
 SX710 HS TG-320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Neither features selfie screen
Touch display  Neither features Touch display
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX710 HS enjoys external measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Canon SX710 HS and Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the SX710 HS against the TG-320.
Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX710 HS and TG-320 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
More often than not, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching specifications. The graphic underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX710 HS and TG-320.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Canon SX710 HS to result in more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The newer SX710 HS should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

            Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
 Canon SX710 HS as a Portrait photography camera
 Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
47
 you can focus manually
 sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
 includes face detect autofocus
 external flash not possible
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
33
 good MP (14MP)
 features face detection autofocus
 manual focus not available
 lack of manual mode
 no external flash support
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
Photography Glossary
Street Comparison
Canon SX710 HS Street photography info
Olympus TG-320 Street photography info
62
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than others in class (269g)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
66
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proof
 lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
 Canon SX710 HS as a Sports photography camera
 Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
47
 long zoom range (25-750mm  30.0 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
 includes tracking focus
 painfully slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames per second)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 terrible battery power (230 shots)
 has no phase detect autofocus
40
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good MP (14MP)
 features tracking autofocus
 environment proof
 continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
 no shutter priority
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 bad battery pack (150 CIPA)
 does not have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Travel Comparison
Canon SX710 HS Travel photography info
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography info
66
 lighter than others in class (269 grams)
 sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 reasonably wide (25mm)
 great reach (750mm)
 missing Timelapse function
 terrible battery power (230 per charge)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
67
 lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
 environment proof
 good MP (14MP)
 flash built-in
 decently wide (28mm)
 doesn't have Timelapse function
 bad battery pack (150 CIPA)
 display is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Landscape Comparison
Canon SX710 HS Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography info
49
 you can focus manually
 reasonably wide (25mm)
 screen size is good (3 inch)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
 terrible battery power (230 shots)
 missing Timelapse function
39
 decently wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good MP (14 megapixels)
 environment proof
 manual focus not available
 can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 screen is small (2.7 inches)
 lack of manual mode
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
 bad battery pack (150 CIPA)
 doesn't have Timelapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon SX710 HS
Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
34
 reasonably wide (25mm)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 includes face detect autofocus
 high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than others in class (269g)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 missing microphone port
32
 decently wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 features face detection autofocus
 lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 display is not selfie friendly
 video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
 doesn't have external microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
        
                
        

          

            
Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX710 HS and Olympus TG-320
 Canon PowerShot SX710 HSOlympus TG-320
General Information
Company Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot SX710 HS Olympus TG-320
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Launched 2015-01-06 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 6 TruePic III+
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW images    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Touch to focus    
Autofocus continuous    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-750mm (30.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-6.9 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focusing range 1cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 922k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch function    
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 6.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 3.50 m 5.80 m
Flash settings Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 269 grams (0.59 lb) 155 grams (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 113 x 66 x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 230 shots 150 shots
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NB-6LH LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Retail pricing $349 $0