Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-4
89 Imaging
45 Features
51 Overall
47
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 269g - 113 x 66 x 35mm
- Introduced January 2015
- Previous Model is Canon SX700 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX720 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-5
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Canon SX710 HS versus Olympus TG-4, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the SX710 HS (20MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX710 HS was launched 3 months prior to the TG-4 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SX710 HS scores versus the TG-4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX710 HS and Olympus Tough TG-4. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX710 HS Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX710 HS over the Olympus TG-4
| SX710 HS | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Canon SX710 HS
| TG-4 | SX710 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX710 HS and Olympus TG-4
| SX710 HS | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2015 | April 2015 | Same generation | |
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Canon SX710 HS offers exterior measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX710 HS versus Olympus TG-4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the SX710 HS vs the TG-4.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SX710 HS and TG-4 is 89 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out specs. The photograph underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SX710 HS and TG-4.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Canon SX710 HS to show greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively.
Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX710 HS | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX710 HS | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2015-01-06 | 2015-04-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 6 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269g (0.59 lb) | 247g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 pictures | 380 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $349 | $379 |