Canon SX720 HS vs Casio EX-ZR400
Portability
89 Imaging
46 Features
51 Overall
48
89 Imaging
46 Features
51 Overall
48
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Canon SX720 HS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Key Specs
Canon SX720 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 270g - 110 x 64 x 36mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Superseded the Canon SX710 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX730 HS
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX720 HS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Canon SX720 HS and Casio EX-ZR400, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Canon and Casio. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the SX720 HS (20.3MP) and EX-ZR400 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX720 HS was introduced 3 years later than the EX-ZR400 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a concise summation of how the SX720 HS grades versus the EX-ZR400 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX720 HS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX720 HS & Casio Exilim EX-ZR400. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX720 HS Gallery & Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX720 HS over the Casio EX-ZR400
| SX720 HS | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 38 months |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 461k | Crisper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Canon SX720 HS
| EX-ZR400 | SX720 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX720 HS and Casio EX-ZR400
| SX720 HS | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Canon SX720 HS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and size. The Canon SX720 HS offers outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 270 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Casio EX-ZR400 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX720 HS and Casio EX-ZR400 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the SX720 HS versus the EX-ZR400.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SX720 HS and EX-ZR400 is 89 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX720 HS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by looking through technical specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SX720 HS and EX-ZR400.
As you can tell, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Canon SX720 HS to provide you with more detail using its extra 4.3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern SX720 HS will have an edge in sensor technology.
Canon SX720 HS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX720 HS Portrait photography details
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography details
has manual focus
good MP (20.3 megapixels)
offers face detect focusing
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
has manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX720 HS
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR400
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (270g)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (205 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Canon SX720 HS Sports photography highlights
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography highlights
amazing zoom range (24-960mm 40.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (20.3MP)
offers tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (5.9 fps)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (250 shots)
has no phase detect AF
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast continuous shooting (30.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
great battery pack (500 per charge)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Canon SX720 HS Travel photography advice
Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography advice
lighter than competition in class (270g)
good MP (20.3MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long reach (960mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
not so great battery power (250 shots)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
great battery pack (500 shots)
lighter than competitors in class (205g)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
does not have selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Canon SX720 HS Landscape photography details
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography details
has manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (20.3 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
not so great battery power (250 shots)
lack of Time Lapse mode
has manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
great battery pack (500 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Canon SX720 HS Vlogging information
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging information
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (270 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of mic port
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (205 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon SX720 HS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX720 HS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX720 HS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2016-02-18 | 2013-01-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 6 | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20.3 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922k dot | 461k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 15 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.9 frames per second | 30.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 270g (0.60 lb) | 205g (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 shots | 500 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-13L | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $379 | $0 |