Canon SX720 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
Portability
89 Imaging
47 Features
51 Overall
48
89 Imaging
47 Features
51 Overall
48
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Canon SX720 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
Canon SX720 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 270g - 110 x 64 x 36mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Old Model is Canon SX710 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX730 HS
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX720 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Canon SX720 HS and Olympus TG-820 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Olympus. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the SX720 HS (20.3MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX720 HS was introduced 4 years after the TG-820 iHS which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the SX720 HS matches up against the TG-820 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX720 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX720 HS and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX720 HS Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX720 HS over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| SX720 HS | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | February 2012 | Newer by 50 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Canon SX720 HS
| TG-820 iHS | SX720 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 922k | Sharper screen (+108k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX720 HS and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| SX720 HS | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX720 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX720 HS has physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 270 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX720 HS and Olympus TG-820 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the SX720 HS and the TG-820 iHS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX720 HS and TG-820 iHS is 89 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX720 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing a spec sheet. The image below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX720 HS and TG-820 iHS.
Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Canon SX720 HS to show greater detail using its extra 8.3MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer SX720 HS provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX720 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX720 HS Portrait photography highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography highlights
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20.3MP)
includes face detection autofocus
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
provides face detect focusing
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX720 HS
Street photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (270 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Canon SX720 HS Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography highlights
great zoom range (24-960mm 40.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20.3 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.9 fps)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery (250 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking focus
weather sealing
slow frames per second (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery (220 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon SX720 HS
Travel photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
lighter than average (270 grams)
decent sensor resolution (20.3MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (960mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
bad battery (250 CIPA)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
weather sealing
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
bad battery (220 shots)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX720 HS
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20.3MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
bad battery (250 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse recording
decently wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
manual exposure not possible
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
bad battery (220 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Canon SX720 HS Vlogging information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging information
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (270g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have external microphone jack
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic support
Photography Glossary
Canon SX720 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX720 HS | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX720 HS | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2016-02-18 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 6 | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20.3 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.9fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 270 grams (0.60 pounds) | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | 220 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-13L | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $379 | $500 |
