Canon SX720 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
89 Imaging
46 Features
51 Overall
48


85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Canon SX720 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 270g - 110 x 64 x 36mm
- Announced February 2016
- Replaced the Canon SX710 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX730 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Announced March 2010

Canon SX720 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Canon SX720 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Canon and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX720 HS (20.3MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the SX720 HS (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor dimensions.

The SX720 HS was revealed 6 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX720 HS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the SX720 HS scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Canon SX720 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX720 HS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are available at Canon SX720 HS Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX720 HS over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
SX720 HS | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | ![]() | March 2010 | Fresher by 73 months |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Canon SX720 HS
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | SX720 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX720 HS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
SX720 HS | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Canon SX720 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Canon SX720 HS enjoys exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 270 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX720 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the SX720 HS compared to the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SX720 HS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 89 and 85 respectively.

Canon SX720 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SX720 HS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Clearly, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SX720 HS having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Canon SX720 HS will provide you with more detail because of its extra 10.3MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher SX720 HS is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Canon SX720 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX720 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX720 HS | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX720 HS | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-02-18 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 6 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20.3 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 922k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 180s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.9fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 270 grams (0.60 pounds) | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 shots | 410 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-13L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $379 | $349 |