Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus VR-320
88 Imaging
47 Features
59 Overall
51
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 300g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Introduced April 2017
- Old Model is Canon SX720 HS
- Successor is Canon SX740 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Canon SX730 HS and Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the SX730 HS (20.3MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX730 HS was introduced 5 years later than the VR-320 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a brief view of how the SX730 HS grades against the VR-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX730 HS & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX730 HS Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX730 HS over the Olympus VR-320
SX730 HS | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2017 | July 2011 | Fresher by 70 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Canon SX730 HS
VR-320 | SX730 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX730 HS and Olympus VR-320
SX730 HS | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon SX730 HS has physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Canon SX730 HS and Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the SX730 HS versus the VR-320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX730 HS and VR-320 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by going through specifications. The photograph below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX730 HS and VR-320.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Canon SX730 HS to produce extra detail using its extra 6.3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern SX730 HS will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Olympus VR-320 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2017-04-06 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 6 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20.3 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.9 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 300g (0.66 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $399 | $179 |