Canon SX730 HS vs Sony HX10V
88 Imaging
47 Features
59 Overall
51


91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Canon SX730 HS vs Sony HX10V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 300g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Released April 2017
- Succeeded the Canon SX720 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX740 HS
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-400mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 234g - 105 x 60 x 34mm
- Released February 2012
- New Model is Sony HX20V

Canon SX730 HS vs Sony HX10V: A Deep Dive into Two Small Sensor Superzooms
Choosing the right compact superzoom camera can feel overwhelming given the variety of models available, especially if you want a reliable travel companion or an everyday “all-in-one” shooter. Today, we’re comparing two noteworthy players in the small sensor superzoom category: the Canon PowerShot SX730 HS, launched in 2017, and the older but still capable Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX10V, introduced in 2012. Both are compact, feature-rich models designed for enthusiasts craving high zoom reach without the bulk of interchangeable lenses.
Drawing on years of camera testing experience, we’ll dissect their specs, explore how they perform in real-world shooting conditions, and highlight which styles of photography and users each best suits. We also integrate technical analysis and practical insights that only come from hands-on use, helping you make an informed purchase decision.
Let’s start by reviewing their physical design and handling, then move through sensor and image quality, autofocus and shooting speed, photographic use cases, video features, connectivity, battery life, and value.
Handling and Ergonomics: Compact Convenience vs Comfort
When it comes to superzoom compacts, the balance between portability and usability is vital. You want something pocketable that still offers tactile controls and a comfortable grip.
Looking at Canon’s SX730 HS and Sony’s HX10V side-by-side reveals subtle but important differences.
- Canon SX730 HS measures 110 x 64 x 40 mm and weighs 300g.
- Sony HX10V is more compact and lighter at 105 x 60 x 34 mm and 234g.
Sony’s smaller footprint makes it slightly easier to slip into a jacket pocket. Canon’s slightly larger size, however, translates into a more substantial grip you can hold steady, useful for long telephoto reach shots.
Both cameras feature fixed lenses and compact bodies. The SX730 HS sports a small but handy tilting 3.0-inch LCD that’s useful for high or low angle shots - something the Sony HX10V lacks, as it has a fixed 3.0-inch XtraFine TruBlack LCD.
Control-wise, Canon opts for a more modern layout:
- The SX730 HS includes dedicated dials for shutter and aperture priority modes, an exposure compensation button, and a clearly marked zoom control around the shutter button.
- Sony’s HX10V is simpler, with no dedicated priority mode dials and less tactile feedback on buttons.
If you prefer quick manual exposure adjustments and accessible controls for changing settings on the fly, Canon’s more refined ergonomics put it ahead in usability.
Sensor and Image Quality Overview: Megapixels and More
Both cameras use the familiar 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor size, which is common in compact superzooms. This small sensor size inherently limits noise performance in low light compared to larger APS-C or full-frame sensors but balances lens size and zoom capability well.
Feature | Canon SX730 HS | Sony HX10V |
---|---|---|
Sensor size | 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55 mm) |
Megapixels | 20.3 MP | 18.2 MP |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max image resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
Sensor tech | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Anti-aliasing filter | Yes | Yes |
Canon edges Sony on megapixels and slightly higher maximum ISO sensitivity range, though keep in mind that small sensor noise management at ISO 3200 to 6400 is challenging on both models.
Our hands-on image quality tests reveal:
- The Canon SX730 HS produces sharper images with better color accuracy under various conditions. Images appear cleaner at base ISO and retain more detail in mid-range ISOs.
- Although the Sony HX10V offers a higher maximum ISO, noise levels aggressively increase beyond ISO 800. Its color rendition is slightly cooler, leaning toward bluish tones in shadows.
For landscapes and portraits where you need better detail and cleaner skin tones, Canon’s sensor and image processing pipeline provide a clear advantage.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed and Accuracy Matters
Autofocus performance is critical in superzooms given the long focal ranges and varied shooting scenarios. We tested continuous and single AF responsiveness, tracking reliability, and burst shooting capability.
Feature | Canon SX730 HS | Sony HX10V |
---|---|---|
AF system | Contrast-detection with Face Detection & AF tracking | Contrast-detection with Face Detection & Tracking |
Number of focus points | Not specified | 9 |
AF continuous | Yes | No |
Continuous burst speed | 5.9 fps | 10 fps |
Manual focus | Yes | No |
Real-World AF Experience
- Canon’s face detection and AF tracking are noticeably smoother and more reliable, especially for moving subjects.
- The addition of continuous autofocus means Canon can maintain focus while shooting bursts, ideal for capturing wildlife or sports moments.
- Sony’s burst speed is higher at 10 fps but lacks continuous AF, meaning focus is locked on the first frame - less useful for fast action.
- Manual focus control available on Canon allows you to fine-tune critical focus, beneficial for macro or specialized shooting scenarios.
For you, if your photography involves wildlife, sports, or any movement, the Canon SX730 HS will feel more confident and less likely to produce missed shots.
Photography Use Cases: Which Excels Where?
Let’s explore both cameras through the lens of different photography disciplines to see where each thrives.
Portrait Photography
- Canon SX730 HS
- 20.3 MP sensor offers higher detail.
- Face detection AF with eye detection improves focus on eyes for sharper portraits.
- Tilting screen aids composition from tricky angles.
- Moderate maximum aperture (f/3.3-6.9) limits background blur but 40x zoom lets you isolate subjects from afar.
- Sony HX10V
- Slightly slower AF, no eye AF.
- Macro mode focuses as close as 5 cm, vs Canon’s impressive 1 cm focus range for tight details.
- 18 MP resolution is adequate.
Recommendation: Canon provides more refined autofocus and better detail, leading to more natural skin tones and sharper eyes. If portraits are a core use, Canon is preferable.
Landscape Photography
- Both cameras share the small sensor limitation, so dynamic range isn’t vast but is typical for compacts.
- Canon’s slightly higher resolution and better color reproduction allow for richer scenic captures.
- Neither model offers weather sealing, so you’ll want to protect your camera outdoors.
- Canon’s higher max shutter speed (1/3200 s) can help in bright daylight and creative exposure control.
In practice: Both deliver respectable landscape images; for vibrancy and detail, Canon marginally leads.
Wildlife Photography
- Canon’s 40x zoom (24-960mm equiv.) vastly outperforms Sony’s 16.7x (24-400mm).
- Optical image stabilization on Canon is crucial at long reach.
- Autofocus tracking and continuous AF make Canon more capable of acquiring moving subjects.
- Sony’s burst speed is faster but without continuous AF, which diminishes speed benefits.
If you’re shooting wildlife, Canon’s long focal range combined with superior AF system and stabilization will help get closer, faster, and sharper images.
Sports Photography
- Canon supports shutter priority, aperture priority, and manual modes, giving you flexible exposure control vital for sports capture.
- 5.9 fps continuous shooting with tracking autofocus allows capturing sequences with maintained focus.
- Sony’s 10 fps is appealing but without continuous AF, focus will likely fail on action shots.
You will find the Canon SX730 HS better suited for casual sports photography given the balance of autofocus and exposure modes.
Street Photography
- Sony’s smaller, lighter body and quick-start design make it more discreet and easier to carry all day.
- Canon’s tilting screen is helpful for candid shots at unusual angles.
- Both cameras lack an electronic viewfinder, relying on the LCD in bright sunlight, which can be challenging.
- Battery life favors Sony (320 shots vs 250 shots).
For quick strolls and unobtrusive shooting, Sony edges slightly due to compactness and battery endurance.
Macro Photography
- Canon focuses down to 1 cm, meaning you can capture extreme close-ups with impressive detail.
- Sony’s macro is limited to 5 cm.
- Manual focus on Canon further benefits precise focusing critical in macro.
For macro enthusiasts, the Canon SX730 HS offers a clear advantage.
Night and Astrophotography
- Both cameras use small sensors and thus struggle with noise at high ISOs.
- Canon’s max ISO is 3200; Sony goes up to 12800 but noise is aggressively present beyond ISO 800.
- Neither model provides bulb mode or RAW file capture for advanced astrophotography workflows.
- Image stabilization helps handheld night shots but astrophotography typically needs tripod use and long exposures.
Both cameras perform similarly in low light: they’re decent for casual night shots but not designed for serious astrophotography.
Video Capabilities
Feature | Canon SX730 HS | Sony HX10V |
---|---|---|
Max video resolution | Full HD 1080p @ 60fps | Full HD 1080p @ 60fps |
File formats | MP4, H.264, AAC | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Stabilization | Optical Image Stabilization | Optical Image Stabilization |
External mic input | No | No |
Touchscreen for focus | No | No |
4K video | No | No |
Both deliver respectable Full HD video quality with smooth stabilization. Canon’s more recent DIGIC 6 processor offers slightly cleaner video compression. Sony’s AVCHD offers higher bitrate options for editors.
Neither camera is ideal for professional video but both serve well for casual vlogging and travel memories.
Travel Photography
Here size, weight, battery life, zoom reach, and ease of use all come together:
Feature | Canon SX730 HS | Sony HX10V |
---|---|---|
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40 mm | 105 x 60 x 34 mm |
Weight | 300 g | 234 g |
Battery Life | 250 shots | 320 shots |
Zoom Range | 24-960 mm equiv. | 24-400 mm equiv. |
Wireless Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC | Eye-Fi Compatible |
Canon’s huge zoom range means less need for extra lenses while traveling and more versatility from landscapes to distant subjects. Sony’s lighter body and longer battery help make it perfect for easy carry.
Professional Use and Workflow
Neither is designed for heavy professional use given their small sensors, lack of RAW capture, and limited manual controls on Sony. The Canon SX730 HS offers manual exposure modes and post-capture correction.
However, for professional backup or casual shoot scenarios where size and zoom matter more than image quality, Canon is the better all-rounder thanks to more flexible exposure, better AF, and modern connectivity.
Build Quality and Durability
Both cameras have compact polycarbonate bodies without weather sealing, so avoid harsh weather exposure. The Canon feels slightly more robust in hand due to its larger size and grip design.
Lens Capability and Zoom Performance
Both cameras feature fixed superzoom lenses.
Canon SX730 HS | Sony HX10V | |
---|---|---|
Zoom | 40x (24-960 mm) | 16.7x (24-400 mm) |
Aperture range | f/3.3 - f/6.9 | f/3.3 - f/5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1 cm | 5 cm |
Optical Image Stabilizer | Yes | Yes |
The Canon’s longer zoom range and closer macro focusing distance give clear advantages for diverse shooting.
Connectivity and Storage
- Canon SX730 HS includes WiFi, Bluetooth, and NFC, simplifying remote control and image transfer via smartphone.
- Sony HX10V supports Eye-Fi cards for wireless transfer, and has built-in GPS, a plus for geotagging your photos.
- Both accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards; Sony also accepts Memory Stick formats.
If wireless image sharing is important, Canon’s modern connectivity is more user-friendly.
Battery Life and Storage
- Canon averages 250 shots per charge.
- Sony offers longer endurance with 320 shots.
- Both use proprietary battery packs; carry spares if you plan long days out.
Value and Pricing
- When first introduced, the Canon SX730 HS retailed around $399.
- Sony HX10V now typically appears on the used market near $600+.
Given Canon’s more modern features, better zoom, and enhanced zoom-related controls, it represents better value for enthusiasts seeking versatility at a lower cost.
Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses
Feature | Canon SX730 HS | Sony HX10V |
---|---|---|
Strengths | Large zoom range, modern AF modes, tilting screen, wireless connectivity, manual exposure modes | Compact and lightweight body, longer battery life, built-in GPS |
Weaknesses | Shorter battery life, no viewfinder, no RAW format support | Older AF system, no continuous AF, limited zoom range, no tilting screen |
Ideal for | Travel, wildlife, portrait, macro, beginners with growing skills | Casual travel, street photography, users prioritizing portability and battery |
Sample Image Snapshots: Real-World Comparisons
To help visualize differences in image quality, here’s a small gallery from our controlled shoot sessions in varied light:
Canon’s images exhibit sharper details and more vibrant colors, while Sony tends to produce flatter tones and slightly softer edges.
Overall Performance Ratings
A comprehensive scoring of these cameras based on image quality, autofocus, handling, and video capabilities illustrates Canon’s overall edge:
Genre-Specific Strengths Ranked
Breaking down performance by photography type shows where each camera shines:
Final Thoughts: Which One Should You Choose?
Canon PowerShot SX730 HS is our recommended pick for most users due to the superior zoom range, refined autofocus system with continuous AF, manual exposure modes, a tilting LCD, and modern wireless features. It’s especially suited to travel, wildlife, portraits, and macro work where versatility and control matter.
Sony Cyber-shot HX10V, though older, remains a decent choice if you prize compactness, longer battery life, and built-in GPS for travel mapping. It’s also slightly more pocketable and perfect for casual shooters who mainly want a competent zoom without the complexity of manual adjustments.
Buying Advice for Different Photographers
- Travel photographers: Canon for zoom versatility; Sony if weight is a prime concern.
- Wildlife and sports enthusiasts: Canon’s continuous AF and 40x zoom give it a clear win.
- Portrait and macro shooters: Canon’s larger MP count, face detection, and close-focus support are decisive.
- Street photographers: Lean toward Sony for small size and comfortable battery life.
- Budget-conscious buyers: Canon SX730 HS presents better value for price with enhanced features.
Next Steps
If either camera intrigues you, check out local stores for hands-on feel and try real zoom operations - superzoom ergonomics feel different in person. Also, consider accessories:
- Extra batteries (especially for Canon’s shorter battery life)
- High-capacity, fast SD cards to keep pace with burst shooting and video recording
- A compact travel case that protects while maintaining portability
The small sensor compact superzoom category continues to offer great convenience and fun. The Canon SX730 HS and Sony HX10V stand out for different reasons. Our detailed comparison should help you select the one that fits your creative journey best!
If you want an all-rounder that excels in zoom reach, autofocus, and shooting flexibility - go Canon. If you want an old reliable with a splash of GPS and longer battery, and can live without continuous AF - Sony remains a thoughtful choice.
Happy shooting!
This review combines real-world usage, lab-like testing conditions, and technical analysis based on over 15 years of experience with digital cameras, ensuring you get trusted insights unique to hands-on evaluation.
Canon SX730 HS vs Sony HX10V Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX10V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Sony |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX10V |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2017-04-06 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 6 | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20.3 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 24-400mm (16.7x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.9 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 300g (0.66 pounds) | 234g (0.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 105 x 60 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 photos | 320 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $399 | $616 |