Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S7
88 Imaging
47 Features
63 Overall
53
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 299g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Launched July 2018
- Superseded the Canon SX730 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 121g - 97 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S7: A Hands-On Comparison From a Seasoned Camera Tester
Selecting a camera these days can feel like sifting through an avalanche of options - some flashy, some basic, some aimed at pros and others at casual snapshooters. Today, I’m sharing an in-depth, no-nonsense comparison of two compact cameras from different eras and specialties: the relatively recent Canon PowerShot SX740 HS and the decade-old Casio Exilim EX-S7. These cameras tackle different niches, but I find it fascinating to explore how each fares in real-world use, across various photography styles.
Having logged thousands of hours testing cameras large and small, I aim to give you a practical, expert take on how these two perform, where they shine, and where they fall short - especially through the lens of today’s photography demands and budgets.
At First Glance: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
Before diving into specs, the feel in your hands is a crucial factor. The Canon SX740 HS is a small sensor superzoom, equipped with a long 40x zoom lens, and designed to balance portability with versatility. The Casio EX-S7, on the other hand, is a compact ultracompact camera focused on pocket-friendly ease, with a modest 3x zoom.

The Canon’s dimensions (110x64x40 mm at 299g) give it a reassuring heft for its category, making it feel more secure to hold for extended shooting. The Casio is significantly slimmer and lighter (97x57x20 mm at 121g), truly pocketable, but sacrificing grip comfort. If you shoot a lot on the go or want a camera to slip effortlessly into a jacket or purse pocket, the Casio wins hands-down for portability.
However, the Canon benefits from a more thoughtfully placed controls layout, lending itself to quicker adjustments in the field. The Casio’s control surfaces are minimal and basic, reflecting its entry-level approach.
Topside and Control Layout: More than Meets the Eye
How a camera’s controls are arranged impacts workflow and overall shooting experience. The SX740 HS offers more physical dials and buttons for things like exposure compensation, ISO, and drive modes, which I appreciate as a photographer who likes quick access over menu diving.

The Casio EX-S7’s controls are bare-bones, with no manual exposure modes or prioritized controls. Newcomers might find its simplicity less intimidating, but photographers accustomed to manual or semi-manual shooting modes will miss the creative freedom.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality
A critical foundation for image quality is sensor technology. Both cameras use a 1/2.3-inch sensor size, which is quite common for compacts, but differ in technology and resolution.

Canon SX740 HS
- Sensor: 20.3 MP BSI-CMOS (back-illuminated for better low light)
- Max ISO: 3200 native
- No RAW support
- Anti-aliasing filter present
Casio EX-S7
- Sensor: 12.1 MP CCD sensor (older generation)
- Max ISO: 1600 (native)
- No RAW support
- Anti-aliasing filter present
The Canon’s sensor is notably more advanced - the BSI-CMOS design collects light more efficiently, boosting performance in dim conditions. The SX740’s higher resolution (20 MP) also means more detail can be teased out, important for cropping or large prints.
The Casio’s CCD sensor was quality in its day, but shows its age through lower resolution and reduced sensitivity, resulting in noisier images in anything but bright sunlight.
Image quality-wise, the SX740 HS is the clear winner, especially when shooting in lower light or when you want crisp details.
Rear LCD and User Interface
Checking your photos and accessing menu items is a daily ritual, so a quality rear screen counts.

The Canon’s 3-inch, 922k-dot tilting screen makes framing tricky angles and selfies (it’s selfie-friendly) much easier. The tilt mechanism is a nice plus for vloggers and creative shooting positions.
Casio’s 2.7-inch, fixed LCD is dimmer and lower resolution (230k dots). It suffices for basic framing but lacks flexibility and sharpness.
Neither camera offers touchscreen control or an electronic viewfinder - understandable given their price and category but something professionals and advanced enthusiasts should consider.
Zoom Range and Lens Versatility
For many users, the zoom lens quality and reach can make or break a camera choice.
- Canon SX740 HS boasts a powerful 24-960mm equivalent (40x zoom) lens with aperture range f/3.3-6.9.
- Casio EX-S7 has a modest 36-107mm equivalent (3x zoom) lens with an aperture range f/3.1-5.6.
This giant zoom leap on the Canon opens many doors: wildlife, sports, or travel photos benefit from the ability to get close without switching lenses or carrying extra gear. The Casio’s zoom is much more limited and best suited for snapshots or casual travel pictures.
That said, the Canon’s superzoom lens compromises maximum aperture at telephoto, impacting background blur and low-light capability at long focal lengths.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed
Autofocus speed and accuracy fundamentally affect how well you capture fleeting moments, especially in wildlife or sports.
Canon SX740 HS
- Contrast detection AF with face detection and tracking
- 10 fps continuous shooting speed
- Autofocus modes: Single, Continuous, Tracking
- Touch focus and face/eye detection present
Casio EX-S7
- Contrast-detection AF without tracking or face detection
- No continuous shooting mode or burst capabilities
- Manual focus option available but limited
In real-world field testing, the Canon SX740 HS performed admirably for a compact camera: quick to lock focus in daylight, usable continuous shooting for capturing action, and decent face detection for portraiture. The Casio’s autofocus felt sluggish and less reliable, especially in low light or moving subjects.
Low-Light and ISO Performance
Low-light shooting reveals sensor and image processor capabilities. Here, the SX740’s Digic 8 processor and BSI sensor give it a distinct advantage. While it maxes out at ISO 3200, grain and noise levels remain controlled up to ISO 1600 in my testing.
The Casio EX-S7 tops at ISO 1600 but with more noticeable noise and softness - typical of older CCD sensors and processors.
Battery Life and Storage
The Canon comes with a rechargeable Battery Pack, rated at around 265 shots per charge under CIPA standards, which is modest but adequate for typical day trips. The Casio lacks published battery life data but relies on an NP-80 battery that tends to be less robust - expect frequent recharges if you shoot a lot.
Both cameras use SD card slots compatible with SDHC and SDXC cards. The Canon supports faster UHS-I cards, beneficial for buffering large images and HD videos.
Video Capabilities
If video matters, the differences are notable.
- Canon SX740 HS records 4K UHD at 30p, encodes in H.264/MPEG-4, but lacks microphone inputs.
- Casio EX-S7 tops out at 720p (1280×720) at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format, which is dated and chunky.
The Canon’s 4K video is a huge boon for content creators and enthusiasts wanting high-res clips or the ability to extract still frames. Lack of external mic input limits pro-level sound recording, but for casual video the SX740 HS is among the best in its price class.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
Neither camera sports weather sealing or rugged protection features. Both are typical consumer compacts built more for casual use. The SX740 is marginally bulkier and feels more robust in hand, but neither is built for heavy outdoor punishment.
Connectivity and Modern Features
Connectivity can be a major factor for today’s photographers:
- Canon SX740 includes Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC for seamless wireless image transfer and remote control.
- Casio EX-S7 has no wireless connectivity, reflecting its 2010 design era.
In a hyper-connected world, this gives the Canon a clear edge for social media users and travelers.
Real-World Use Cases by Photography Genre
Now, let’s look at how each camera stacks up in key photography styles.
Portrait Photography
Canon’s face detection autofocus, 20 MP sensor, and tilting screen make it easier to frame natural-looking portraits with believable skin tones. The wide zoom allows subtle background compression and some degree of bokeh at 24-70mm ranges.
Casio’s 12 MP sensor and fixed angle limitations result in flatter, lower detail portraits - better for casual selfies than professional portraiture.
Landscape Photography
Landscape photographers benefit from high resolution, dynamic range, and manual controls. Canon’s higher-res sensor and exposure modes offer more latitude to capture diverse lighting situations. The SX740’s lack of RAW limits post-processing flexibility but the JPEG quality is solid.
Casio’s limited resolution and older sensor technology mean less detail in expansive scenery. No manual exposure modes reduce control.
Wildlife Photography
Telephoto reach is critical here. Canon’s 40x zoom dominates Casio’s 3x lens, enabling wildlife captures from a respectable distance. AF tracking and decent continuous shooting rates aid action shots.
Casio’s narrow zoom and slow AF are insufficient for wildlife.
Sports Photography
Similar to wildlife, speed is key. Canon’s 10 fps burst and AF tracking help attack this. Casio falls short, no continuous shooting.
Street Photography
Portability and discretion matter. Casio’s slim size is advantageous, but the Canon remains pocketable for a superzoom. Casio lacks face detection for fast focus under street crowds. Canon’s low-light capability also shines more for dimly lit scenes.
Macro Photography
Canon’s claimed 1 cm macro focus range is impressive. Image stabilization helps handheld close-ups. Casio’s 10 cm minimum macro limit makes it less adept at fine detail shooting.
Night and Astro Photography
Neither camera is ideal for long exposures or advanced astrophotography. The Canon’s max 15-second shutter and stabilized sensor help more with ambient low-light scenes; Casio maxes out at 4 seconds.
Video Work
Canon’s 4K is a clear winner for vloggers or casual filmmakers; Casio’s 720p is outdated.
Travel Photography
Canon SX740 HS offers outstanding versatility with its zoom range, wireless connectivity, and decent battery life. Casio EX-S7 is ultra-light and pocket-friendly but limited in creative options.
Professional Use
Neither camera targets professional workflows due to lack of RAW output, limited manual controls (Casio), and mediocre build. The Canon’s manual modes and sharp sensor make it a better secondary or travel-friendly backup option.
Strengths and Weaknesses Summary
Canon SX740 HS (Pros):
- Vast 40x optical zoom covering wide focal range
- Modern DIGIC 8 processor with quick AF and face tracking
- 4K video with good detail for price point
- Tilting, high-res LCD screen
- Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC connectivity
- Good low-light handling up to ISO 1600-3200
- Practical manual exposure modes
Canon SX740 HS (Cons):
- No RAW support limits post-processing flexibility
- No electronic viewfinder (EVF) or touchscreen
- Shrinking aperture at full zoom reduces low-light telephoto utility
- Average battery life for a compact zoom
Casio EX-S7 (Pros):
- Extremely compact and lightweight
- Simple ergonomics for casual shooters
- Low price point (often under $150)
- Decent 12 MP image quality in bright light
Casio EX-S7 (Cons):
- Limited 3x zoom range
- Older CCD sensor yields lower image quality and higher noise
- No image stabilization or continuous shooting
- No manual exposure modes or face detection AF
- Weak video specs (720p max)
- No wireless connectivity or modern features
Visual Evidence: Gallery of Both Cameras in Action
Here’s a quick look at sample photos from both models showing differences in sharpness, color fidelity, and noise at various ISO settings:
Performance Scores at a Glance
To wrap up technical assessment, here is an abstracted overall performance rating based on resolution, autofocus, speed, video, and user experience derived from my tests:
Genre-Specific Ratings: Which Is Best for What?
Breaking down suitability for different photographic disciplines:
Who Should Buy the Canon SX740 HS?
If you’re a photography enthusiast wanting an affordable, versatile, travel-friendly camera with a big zoom and manual controls - the Canon SX740 is hard to beat. Its video specs, connectivity, and sensor tech put it in league with some entry-level mirrorless cameras in terms of usability.
It’s a smart choice for casual wildlife, travel, street shooting, and portraits for hobbyists and budget-conscious content creators who want decent image quality without buying multiple lenses.
Who Is the Casio EX-S7 For?
The Casio EX-S7 is best suited for the absolute beginner, cheapskate, or those wanting a pocket camera for quick snapshots with minimal fuss. Its compact form is appealing, but the tradeoff in image quality, speed, and features quickly becomes obvious if you want more than snapshots in good light.
If your photography demands are modest and you prioritize size and simplicity over performance, this remains a passable, very low-cost option.
Final Verdict: Balancing Price, Performance, and Purpose
For around $400 new, the Canon PowerShot SX740 HS packs a punch that still holds up well in 2024 for enthusiast use. Its weaknesses - no RAW, no EVF, modest battery life - are outweighed by its strong zoom, modern sensor, decent speed, and 4K video.
By contrast, the Casio Exilim EX-S7, while cheap, feels frozen in time, limited by outdated hardware and features. It’s good only for hobbyists with tight budgets who want utmost portability and don’t mind middling image quality.
If you want a camera that will keep up with multiple photography styles and deliver reasonable image and video quality for casual to enthusiast shooting, the Canon SX740 HS is the clear practical winner.
Wrapping Up
Choosing between the Canon SX740 HS and the Casio EX-S7 comes down to your photography goals and budget:
- For serious versatility and image quality in a compact package - Canon SX740 HS
- For minimum cost, ultra compact, casual shooting - Casio EX-S7
With my years of testing and field work, I recommend prioritizing the Canon as a budget-friendly all-arounder that equips you for a wide swath of photographic adventures without breaking the bank.
Happy shooting! And remember, the best camera is the one you actually take out and use.
If you want to dive deeper, feel free to reach out or check out other hands-on reviews where I dissect lenses, settings, and shooting workflows in practice.
Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S7 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX740 HS | Casio Exilim EX-S7 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX740 HS | Casio Exilim EX-S7 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2018-07-31 | 2010-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 8 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 299 grams (0.66 pounds) | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 97 x 57 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 265 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | NP-80 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $400 | $140 |