Canon SX740 HS vs Sony HX5
88 Imaging
47 Features
63 Overall
53
92 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Canon SX740 HS vs Sony HX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 299g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Revealed July 2018
- Earlier Model is Canon SX730 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX740 HS vs Sony HX5 - Compact Zoom Titans Put to the Test
When stepping into the world of compact cameras with zoom capabilities, budget-conscious buyers often face the perplexing task of choosing between models released years apart but still holding their weight. The Canon PowerShot SX740 HS (2018) and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 (2010) are two such contenders. Both appeal to casual photographers and enthusiasts craving portability with zoom reach, yet they differ significantly in technology, features, and performance curves.
Having rigorously tested both cameras across varied shooting disciplines - from portraiture to wildlife, low-light astrophotography to travel scenarios - I’ll walk you through the detailed nuances that set these two compacts apart. Buckle up for a thorough, friendly comparison steeped in hands-on experience, practical insights, and honest evaluations.
Size, Handling, and Ergonomics - The First Tactile Impressions
Let’s kick things off with how these cameras feel in the hands - an often overlooked factor that can make or break your shooting joy.

Physically, both cameras sport compact builds, but the Canon SX740 HS noticeably ups the ante in thickness (40mm vs. the Sony’s 29mm) and weight (299g vs. 200g). While still lightweight overall, the SX740’s beefier grip and chunkier body provide a more reassuring hold, especially during extended handheld shooting sessions. The extra heft helps impart stability, minimizing shake - a bonus when using the Canon’s impressive 40x optical zoom.
The Sony HX5’s slim, pocket-friendly silhouette shines for street photographers and travelers prioritizing ultra-compact gear. However, its slender frame means the controlling buttons feel a bit cramped, notably if you have larger fingers or the urge to grumble about clubs for thumbs (I’ve been there). The Canon strikes a better balance of portability and ergonomics, with well-spaced controls that you can intuitively operate even with gloves on.
Moving up to the top plates, check these babies out:

Here, the Canon wins points for clearer button legibility and dials that offer direct access to aperture and shutter priority modes. The Sony’s top controls are simpler, but the lack of dedicated manual exposure dials may irk enthusiasts who like swift physical tweaks without diving into menus - more on creative control later.
Summary:
| Camera | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Canon SX740 HS | Ergonomic grip, tactile controls | Heavier, less pocketable |
| Sony HX5 | Slim, light, easier to pocket | Cramped buttons, limited direct control |
Sensor and Image Quality - How Those Pixels Play Out
Let’s geek out for a moment on the heart of any camera - the sensor. Both cameras use small 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensors with closely matched physical dimensions (Canon’s 6.17x4.55 mm vs Sony’s 6.104x4.578 mm), but the Canon boasts a decisive edge in resolution with 20.3 megapixels over Sony’s 10.1 megapixels.

The higher pixel count on the SX740 HS translates into more detailed images - particularly noticeable when cropping or printing moderately large photos. However, this also demands better lens resolving power and noise management at high ISO. Fortunately, Canon’s DIGIC 8 processor here brings improved noise reduction algorithms, ensuring usable images up to ISO 1600 and even 3200 with some caveats.
Sony’s older sensor, while lower in resolution, can sometimes yield cleaner images at base ISOs thanks to larger photosites spread over fewer pixels, but this advantage diminishes in low light where noise rapidly increases. The HX5’s peak ISO is likewise 3200, but I wouldn’t push it much past 800 on real-world shoots.
In daylight, both cameras produce acceptable results for web posting and casual prints. Canon’s tighter detail retention and slightly stronger dynamic range handling are tangible benefits if you want sharper landscapes or portraits.
On the optics side, the Canon’s 40x zoom (equivalent to 24-960mm) dwarfs the Sony’s 10x (25-250mm) in versatility. The more extensive range gives the SX740 HS the clear edge in wildlife and telephoto-centric shots - not to mention the ability to reach subjects the HX5 simply can’t get close to without sacrificing image quality via digital zoom.
Key takeaway: If raw image quality and zoom reach matter to you, the Canon SX740 HS is the clear winner here.
Rear LCD and User Interface - Your Window to Creativity
Without a viewfinder on either model, the rear LCD is your primary compositional tool. Here’s how they stack up:

The Canon SX740 HS sports a bright, tilting 3-inch screen with 922K-dot resolution. This clarity makes framing and reviewing shots much easier, especially under bright daylight. The tilt mechanism is a godsend for low or high-angle shots, promoting creative perspectives without back-breaking contortion.
The Sony HX5 has a 3-inch fixed LCD at a much lower resolution (230K dots). Viewing sharp details or menus in sunlight is a consistent struggle on this display, which can inhibit shooting confidence in challenging lighting. Also, the fixed position limits compositional flexibility, and the non-touch interface feels dated by today’s standards.
On the menu and control front, Canon’s interface benefits from DIGIC 8’s enhancements offering snappy response, logical menu hierarchies, and exposure aids like highlight warnings. Sony’s menus feel more primitive, laggier, and less intuitive for users accustomed to modern camera software.
If you’re someone who likes to check sharpness critically in the field or experiment with angles, the Canon’s display setup is a vital advantage.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance - Speed and Accuracy in Action
On to one of the most important usability criteria: autofocus (AF), continuous shooting, and overall responsiveness.
| Feature | Canon SX740 HS | Sony HX5 |
|---|---|---|
| AF Type | Contrast-detection + face detection | Contrast-detection |
| AF Points | Multi-area + face detect | 9-point centerweighted |
| AF Modes | Single, continuous, tracking | Single only |
| Continuous shooting fps | 10 fps | 10 fps |
| Shutter speed range | 15 - 1/3200 sec | 30 - 1/1600 sec |
Despite both cameras claiming 10 fps burst modes, the Canon handles this steadily, with a larger buffer allowing longer bursts. The HX5’s buffer fills quickly, limiting burst shots to a few frames before slowing down.
In terms of autofocus, the Canon SX740 HS benefits from more advanced contrast-detect systems enhanced by DIGIC 8 processing that enable face and eye detection. This results in faster, more reliable focusing, especially for portraiture and moving subjects.
The Sony HX5 lacks face detection and does not offer continuous AF or tracking. Its autofocus is generally slower and less confident in low light, which diminishes its utility for active shooting such as sports or wildlife.
I found the Canon’s AF notably more robust in real-world scenarios, nailing focus on wandering subjects, kids, and pets - the kind of situations where a jittery AF would frustrate impatient users.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities - The Reach and Quality Debate
This is where the Canon shines:
- Canon SX740 HS: 24-960mm equivalent focal length, f/3.3-6.9 max aperture
- Sony HX5: 25-250mm equivalent focal length, f/3.5-5.5 max aperture
The Canon’s 40x zoom range covers everything from wide-angle landscapes to extreme telephoto wildlife shots. It’s a versatile workhorse lens that rarely disappoints for day-to-day travel photography or outdoor adventures.
The Sony’s 10x zoom is respectable for a compact and carries slightly wider aperture at the telephoto end (f/5.5 vs Canon’s f/6.9 max), but its reach pales compared to Canon’s.
Macro focusing distance also favors the Canon (1 cm vs Sony’s 5 cm), opening fun creative doors for close-up shots of flowers, insects, or small objects - even if they aren’t specialized macro lenses.
Note: With such a superzoom, optical quality can waver at extreme focal lengths, but Canon’s lens maintains decent sharpness and contrast across the frame. Sony’s lens is optically solid but limited by shorter zoom reach.
Battery Life and Storage - Power That Lasts
If you’re on the move, battery performance affects how many frames you get before scrambling for a charger.
- Canon SX740 HS offers approximately 265 shots per charge, which aligns with typical compact camera stats.
- Sony HX5’s older battery model (NP-BG1) tends to offer fewer shots per charge (manufacturer cites around 220–250), but exact real-world numbers vary as the camera ages.
Neither camera supports USB charging (only external chargers), and both use a single memory card slot (Canon supports SDHC/SDXC; Sony supports Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo and optionally SD cards). This versatility tips a slight edge to Canon given SD cards’ ubiquity and cost.
Connectivity and Extras - Staying Linked in a Wireless World
The Canon SX740 HS is head and shoulders ahead here:
- Wireless connectivity including Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC allows effortless photo transfer to smartphones and remote control via Canon’s apps.
- HDMI output for viewing on big screens.
- USB 2.0 data connection.
Sony HX5 lacks wireless features altogether, a product of its 2010 vintage. It does offer HDMI and USB 2.0 but no convenient way to remotely operate or instantly share images wirelessly.
Video Capabilities - Shooting Moving Moments
For casual video content creators, the Canon also takes the lead:
| Feature | Canon SX740 HS | Sony HX5 |
|---|---|---|
| Max video resolution | 4K UHD (3840x2160) @ 30 fps | Full HD (1920x1080) @ 60 fps |
| Formats | MP4, H.264, AAC | AVCHD |
| Mic/Headphone ports | None | None |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
4K video recording is a big deal in 2018 vs. 2010’s Full HD cap. Canon also provides built-in optical image stabilization, smoothing handheld footage and making the camera more versatile for quick vlogging or family videos.
Sony’s AVCHD format is solid but aging, and limited to Full HD max resolution without 4K possibilities in sight.
Audio options are minimal on both, so external audio recording would require separate gear anyway.
Genre-Specific Snapshots - How These Cameras Fare Across Photography Types
Let’s break things down by genre, referencing real-world testing and practicality.
| Photography Genre | Canon SX740 HS Highlights | Sony HX5 Highlights | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Face detection live, better bokeh control, skin tones pleasing | Modest AF, limited bokeh control | Canon |
| Landscape | Higher resolution, dynamic range, wide-angle starts at 24mm | Decent wide-angle, lower res | Canon |
| Wildlife | 40x zoom, AF tracking, burst shooting | 10x zoom, slower AF, shorter bursts | Canon |
| Sports | 10 fps continuous, decent tracking | 10 fps but shallow buffer, slow AF | Canon |
| Street | Bulkier but tilting screen aids discrete shooting | Lightweight, pocketable, slower AF | Sony (for pocket) |
| Macro | 1 cm minimum focus, good stabilization | 5 cm min focus, less flexible | Canon |
| Night/Astro | ISO 3200 usable, longer shutter speed | Limited ISO performance and slower shutter | Canon |
| Video | 4K Video, better stabilization | Full HD only | Canon |
| Travel | Versatile zoom, wireless transfer | Pocketable, GPS built-in | Depends on needs |
| Professional Work | RAW support absent, limited pro features | No RAW, limited manual modes | Neither (budget compacts) |
More detailed score breakdowns:
Build Quality and Environmental Resilience
Neither camera offers weather sealing or rugged build features like crushproof or waterproof construction. Both are classic compacts meant for fair-weather, casual use.
The Canon’s slightly more robust exterior and upfront grips feel better suited for outdoor excursions, but you’ll still want a rain cover if shooting in wet conditions.
Price and Value - What’s Your Budget Getting You?
At their respective launch prices:
- Canon SX740 HS launched around $400
- Sony HX5 retailed near $275 (in 2010 dollars, which roughly equals $320+ today with inflation)
Today, the HX5 is an older model often found cheaply on used markets or clearance. For your budget, deciding between older tech and modern refinement matters.
If grainy video, clunky interface, and shorter zoom range can be tolerated, Sony’s HX5 remains a capable compact for simple snaps and street shooting on the cheap.
If you crave versatility, superior image quality, and modern conveniences like 4K video, Wi-Fi, and reliable autofocus - the Canon SX740 HS offers far better value for its price bracket.
Final Verdict - Which Compact Superzoom Should You Pick?
After spending dozens of shooting hours with both cameras, here’s my bottom line based on practical shooting scenarios and user profiles:
-
Choose the Canon SX740 HS if you want:
- A powerful zoom range for wildlife, travel, and distant subjects
- Superior image quality and 4K video capability
- Dependable autofocus with face detection for portraits and moving subjects
- Wireless image sharing and more modern usability features
-
Consider the Sony HX5 if you:
- Prioritize extreme compactness and pocketability above all
- Shoot mostly in good light and casual conditions without speed demands
- Want a camera robust enough for quick travels with basic zoom needs
- Need a budget friendly option and can live without contemporary features
For serious enthusiasts or newcomers wanting a flexible powerhouse in a compact, the Canon SX740 HS outclasses the aging Sony HX5 in nearly every crucial aspect. Meanwhile, Sony’s HX5 holds nostalgic value and remains a competent performer where lightness and simplicity matter most.
Ultimately, I recommend the Canon SX740 HS as the more future-proof, capable camera that will satisfy the needs of photography enthusiasts slightly stretching their budget but unwilling to compromise on range, image quality, or versatility.
I hope this in-depth comparison gives you a clear sense of each camera’s strengths, weaknesses, and real-world performance so you can confidently choose your next compact zoom partner. Feel free to reach out with questions or share your own usage experiences - after all, hands-on knowledge is best passed along one photo at a time!
Canon SX740 HS vs Sony HX5 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX740 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX740 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2018-07-31 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 8 | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 3.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 299 gr (0.66 lbs) | 200 gr (0.44 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 265 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, optional SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $400 | $275 |