Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak C140
96 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak C140 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- n/ag - 106 x 59 x 33mm
- Released February 2011
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak C140 Overview
Let's look closer at the Canon SX220 HS versus Kodak C140, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Kodak. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the SX220 HS (12MP) and C140 (8MP) and the SX220 HS (1/2.3") and C140 (1/2.5") have different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX220 HS was launched 2 years later than the C140 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SX220 HS scores vs the C140 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak C140 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon SX220 HS and Kodak EasyShare C140. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX220 HS Gallery and Kodak C140 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX220 HS over the Kodak C140
| SX220 HS | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2011 | January 2009 | More recent by 26 months | |
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Canon SX220 HS
| C140 | SX220 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX220 HS and Kodak C140
| SX220 HS | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak C140 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon SX220 HS features outer dimensions of 106mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Kodak C140 has measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX220 HS versus Kodak C140 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the SX220 HS against the C140.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SX220 HS and C140 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak C140 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SX220 HS and C140.
As you can tell, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SX220 HS due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Canon SX220 HS will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern SX220 HS should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak C140 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak C140 Specifications
| Canon SX220 HS | Kodak EasyShare C140 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Kodak |
| Model | Canon SX220 HS | Kodak EasyShare C140 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-02-07 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 8MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.7-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 13cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30,120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 59 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-5L | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/ MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $399 | $80 |