Clicky

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
43
Overall
38
Canon SX220 HS front
 
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
Portability
65
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs

Canon SX220 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • n/ag - 106 x 59 x 33mm
  • Introduced February 2011
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Announced January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview

Let's look a bit more in depth at the Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Canon and Kodak. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX220 HS (12MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The SX220 HS was released 3 years before the Astro Zoom AZ651 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX220 HS being a Compact camera and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the SX220 HS grades against the Astro Zoom AZ651 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Canon SX220 HS over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 SX220 HS Astro Zoom AZ651 

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Canon SX220 HS

 Astro Zoom AZ651 SX220 HS 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014February 2011Newer by 35 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution920k461kClearer screen (+459k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Canon SX220 HS and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 SX220 HS Astro Zoom AZ651 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX220 HS comes with external measurements of 106mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has proportions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).

See the Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the SX220 HS against the Astro Zoom AZ651.

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SX220 HS and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 96 and 65 respectively.

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The picture here will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX220 HS and Astro Zoom AZ651.

As you can tell, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to render extra detail as a result of its extra 9MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SX220 HS will be behind in sensor technology.

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 sensor size comparison

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX220 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Portrait photography camera
38
manual focus
great flash sync speed (1/2,000s)
features face detect autofocus
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
53
you can focus manually
MP count decent (21MP)
has face detect focus
exports RAW files
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon SX220 HS
Street photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
59
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than average in class (567g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Canon SX220 HS as a Sports photography camera
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Sports photography camera
36
incredible zoom range (28-392mm 14.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking focus
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery (210 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
51
amazing zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (21 megapixels)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Canon SX220 HS Travel photography advice
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Travel photography advice
60
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long reach (392mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
bad battery (210 shots)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
60
MP count decent (21 megapixels)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1560mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than average in class (567g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX220 HS Landscape photography highlights
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Landscape photography highlights
41
manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
bad battery (210 shots)
lack of Timelapse recording
54
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (21 megapixels)
exports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX220 HS as a Vlogging camera
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Vlogging camera
34
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone socket
60
reasonably wide (24mm)
selfie friendly screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
does not have microphone port
more heavy than average in class (567g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX220 HS and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
 Canon SX220 HSKodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651
General Information
Make Canon Kodak
Model Canon SX220 HS Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2011-02-07 2014-01-07
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 21 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-392mm (14.0x) 24-1560mm (65.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focus range 5cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 461k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech PureColor II TG TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 secs -
Highest shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 9.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/2000 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30,120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) 1920 x 1080
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 567 grams (1.25 lbs)
Physical dimensions 106 x 59 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 photos -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-5L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/ MMCplus/HC MMCplus -
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $399 $419