Canon SX220 HS vs Nikon S9900
96 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Canon SX220 HS vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- n/ag - 106 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Superseded the Nikon S9700
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX220 HS vs Nikon S9900 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon SX220 HS vs Nikon S9900, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Canon and Nikon. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the SX220 HS (12MP) and S9900 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX220 HS was released 5 years prior to the S9900 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the SX220 HS matches up against the S9900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Canon SX220 HS vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon SX220 HS and Nikon Coolpix S9900. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX220 HS Gallery and Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX220 HS over the Nikon S9900
| SX220 HS | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Canon SX220 HS
| S9900 | SX220 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 | February 2011 | Newer by 48 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 461k | Crisper display (+460k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Canon SX220 HS and Nikon S9900
| SX220 HS | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Canon SX220 HS vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX220 HS enjoys exterior dimensions of 106mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Nikon S9900 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX220 HS vs Nikon S9900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the SX220 HS and the S9900.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX220 HS and S9900 is 96 and 88 respectively.
Canon SX220 HS vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions only by looking at specs. The picture underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX220 HS and S9900.
All in all, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Nikon S9900 to resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SX220 HS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX220 HS vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX220 HS vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
| Canon SX220 HS | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Nikon |
| Model type | Canon SX220 HS | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-02-07 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30,120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 289g (0.64 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 59 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/ MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $300 |