Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
96 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
69 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- n/ag - 106 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched February 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Superseded the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Refreshed by Olympus SP-610UZ
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Canon SX220 HS and Olympus SP-600 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SX220 HS (12MP) and the SP-600 UZ (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX220 HS was manufactured 13 months later than the SP-600 UZ making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the SX220 HS scores versus the SP-600 UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon SX220 HS & Olympus SP-600 UZ. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX220 HS Gallery & Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX220 HS over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
| SX220 HS | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 | February 2010 | Fresher by 13 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Canon SX220 HS
| SP-600 UZ | SX220 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX220 HS and Olympus SP-600 UZ
| SX220 HS | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Canon SX220 HS has physical dimensions of 106mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-600 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check the Canon SX220 HS and Olympus SP-600 UZ in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the SX220 HS and the SP-600 UZ.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX220 HS and SP-600 UZ is 96 and 69 respectively.
Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading specs. The photograph here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX220 HS and SP-600 UZ.
All in all, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical resolution and you can expect similar quality of photographs however you will need to consider the age of the products into consideration. The more modern SX220 HS will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
| Canon SX220 HS | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon SX220 HS | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-02-07 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.4 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 1/2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30,120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 455 gr (1.00 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 59 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/ MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $189 |