Clicky

Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS

Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
43
Overall
37
Canon SX220 HS front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
44
Overall
41

Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs

Canon SX220 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • n/ag - 106 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed February 2011
Olympus TG-850 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
  • Released January 2014
Photography Glossary

Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview

Below is a in depth comparison of the Canon SX220 HS and Olympus TG-850 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX220 HS (12MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The SX220 HS was unveiled 4 years earlier than the TG-850 iHS and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the SX220 HS grades vs the TG-850 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Canon SX220 HS over the Olympus TG-850 iHS

 SX220 HS TG-850 iHS 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display resolution461k460kClearer display (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Canon SX220 HS

 TG-850 iHS SX220 HS 
ReleasedJanuary 2014February 2011More recent by 36 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Canon SX220 HS and Olympus TG-850 iHS

 SX220 HS TG-850 iHS 
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon SX220 HS offers outer measurements of 106mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Olympus TG-850 iHS has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Compare the Canon SX220 HS and Olympus TG-850 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the SX220 HS versus the TG-850 iHS.

Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SX220 HS and TG-850 iHS is 96 and 91 respectively.

Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison

Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing specifications. The visual here will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX220 HS and TG-850 iHS.

Plainly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-850 iHS to provide you with greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos more aggressively. The older SX220 HS will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison

Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX220 HS Portrait photography highlights
Olympus TG-850 iHS Portrait photography highlights
37
focusing manually
high flash sync (1/2,000 seconds)
has face detection focus
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
34
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
features face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon SX220 HS Street photography advice
Olympus TG-850 iHS Street photography advice
57
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
69
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
environment proofing
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Canon SX220 HS Sports photography details
Olympus TG-850 iHS Sports photography details
35
long zoom range (28-392mm 14.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (210 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
50
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
environment proofing
good battery power (330 shots)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Canon SX220 HS Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-850 iHS Travel photography factors
60
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
very long zoom (392mm)
no Timelapse recording
bad battery pack (210 per charge)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
72
good battery power (330 shots)
environment proofing
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (21mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX220 HS Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-850 iHS Landscape photography details
41
focusing manually
rather wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
bad battery pack (210 shots)
no Timelapse recording
49
really wide (21mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
environment proofing
good battery power (330 CIPA)
no manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX220 HS as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-850 iHS as a Vlogging camera
34
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no external microphone jack
33
really wide (21mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX220 HS and Olympus TG-850 iHS
 Canon SX220 HSOlympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS
General Information
Brand Name Canon Olympus
Model Canon SX220 HS Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Revealed 2011-02-07 2014-01-29
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology TruePic VII
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4616 x 3464
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-392mm (14.0x) 21-105mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/3.5-5.7
Macro focus range 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 461 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology PureColor II TG TFT LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 seconds 1/2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 7.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/2000 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30,120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 218 gr (0.48 pounds)
Physical dimensions 106 x 59 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 photos 330 photos
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NB-5L LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval))
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/ MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots One One
Launch cost $399 $250