Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1
96 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- n/ag - 106 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched February 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Canon SX220 HS and Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the SX220 HS (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very close and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX220 HS was revealed 4 years earlier than the WG-M1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SX220 HS scores versus the WG-M1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon SX220 HS & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are available at Canon SX220 HS Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX220 HS over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SX220 HS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+346k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Canon SX220 HS
| WG-M1 | SX220 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | February 2011 | More modern by 43 months |
Common features in the Canon SX220 HS and Ricoh WG-M1
| SX220 HS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Canon SX220 HS features outer dimensions of 106mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Canon SX220 HS and Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the SX220 HS vs the WG-M1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX220 HS and WG-M1 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX220 HS and WG-M1.
As you can tell, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-M1 to render extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SX220 HS will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Canon SX220 HS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon SX220 HS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-02-07 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30,120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 59 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 shots | 350 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/ MMCplus/HC MMCplus | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $399 | $2,000 |
