Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung HZ35W
96 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- n/ag - 106 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Canon and Samsung. The image resolution of the SX220 HS (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX220 HS was brought out 8 months later than the HZ35W and they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the SX220 HS scores versus the HZ35W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon SX220 HS and Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX220 HS Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX220 HS over the Samsung HZ35W
| SX220 HS | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 | June 2010 | Fresher by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Canon SX220 HS
| HZ35W | SX220 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k | 461k | Clearer screen (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX220 HS and Samsung HZ35W
| SX220 HS | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Canon SX220 HS comes with outside measurements of 106mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the SX220 HS and the HZ35W.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX220 HS and HZ35W is 96 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The photograph here might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX220 HS and HZ35W.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of photos however you really should consider the production date of the products into consideration. The younger SX220 HS provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Canon SX220 HS | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon SX220 HS | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called | - | WB650 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-02-07 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30,120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 59 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/ MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $399 | $300 |