Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung SL620
96 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- n/ag - 106 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched February 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Other Name is PL65
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung SL620, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the SX220 HS (12MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX220 HS was released 24 months later than the SL620 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX220 HS being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the SX220 HS matches up against the SL620 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon SX220 HS and Samsung SL620. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX220 HS Gallery and Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX220 HS over the Samsung SL620
| SX220 HS | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 | February 2009 | More recent by 24 months | |
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Canon SX220 HS
| SL620 | SX220 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX220 HS and Samsung SL620
| SX220 HS | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and volume. The Canon SX220 HS provides external measurements of 106mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung SL620 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the SX220 HS vs the SL620.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SX220 HS and SL620 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX220 HS and SL620.
As you can see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP and you should expect similar quality of photos though you need to factor the production date of the products into consideration. The more recent SX220 HS provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Canon SX220 HS | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon SX220 HS | Samsung SL620 |
| Also Known as | - | PL65 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-02-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30,120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 59 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/ MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $399 | $200 |