Clicky

Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung ST95

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
43
Overall
38
Canon SX220 HS front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31

Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Canon SX220 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • n/ag - 106 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed February 2011
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Released January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung ST95 Overview

Following is a detailed review of the Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung ST95, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Canon and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the SX220 HS (12MP) and ST95 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The SX220 HS was brought out about the same time to the ST95 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Canon SX220 HS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the SX220 HS grades versus the ST95 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX220 HS over the Samsung ST95

 SX220 HS ST95 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Display resolution461k460kClearer display (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Canon SX220 HS

 ST95 SX220 HS 

Common features in the Canon SX220 HS and Samsung ST95

 SX220 HS ST95 
ReleasedFebruary 2011January 2011Similar generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX220 HS has got outside dimensions of 106mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Contrast the Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung ST95 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the SX220 HS and the ST95.

Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX220 HS and ST95 is 96 and 99 respectively.

Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by looking at a spec sheet. The image underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SX220 HS and ST95.

Clearly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung ST95 to give you more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively.

Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon SX220 HS
Portrait photography with Samsung ST95
38
you can focus manually
high flash sync (1/2,000s)
offers face detection focus
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
30
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Canon SX220 HS Street photography highlights
Samsung ST95 Street photography highlights
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
50
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
low max ISO (0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon SX220 HS
Sports photography with Samsung ST95
36
incredible zoom range (28-392mm 14.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
max frames per second very slow (3.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery life (210 CIPA)
lack of phase detect auto focus
27
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon SX220 HS
Travel photography with Samsung ST95
60
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
long reach (392mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
bad battery life (210 CIPA)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
71
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
good maximum aperture (f)
does not have Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX220 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Landscape photography camera
41
you can focus manually
quite wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
bad battery life (210 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
38
good maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
lack of RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX220 HS as a Vlogging camera
Samsung ST95 as a Vlogging camera
34
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not posses selfie friendly display
doesn't have external mic support
27
good maximum aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX220 HS and Samsung ST95
 Canon SX220 HSSamsung ST95
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Samsung
Model Canon SX220 HS Samsung ST95
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Revealed 2011-02-07 2011-01-19
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 -
Lowest native ISO 100 -
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-392mm (14.0x) ()
Highest aperture f/3.1-5.9 -
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 461 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology PureColor II TG TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/3200s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/2000s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30,120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Physical dimensions 106 x 59 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-5L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/ MMCplus/HC MMCplus -
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $399 $145