Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung WB30F
96 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- n/ag - 106 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung WB30F, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the SX220 HS (12MP) and WB30F (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SX220 HS was released 23 months before the WB30F which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the SX220 HS grades versus the WB30F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon SX220 HS & Samsung WB30F. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX220 HS Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX220 HS over the Samsung WB30F
| SX220 HS | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Canon SX220 HS
| WB30F | SX220 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | February 2011 | Fresher by 23 months |
Common features in the Canon SX220 HS and Samsung WB30F
| SX220 HS | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX220 HS provides exterior dimensions of 106mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung WB30F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the SX220 HS vs the WB30F.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SX220 HS and WB30F is 96 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading specs. The graphic here might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX220 HS and WB30F.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Samsung WB30F to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older SX220 HS is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX220 HS vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Canon SX220 HS | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon SX220 HS | Samsung WB30F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-02-07 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30,120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 128 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 59 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/ MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $399 | $180 |